Page 1 of 1

To put things in perspective, test-takers

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:13 pm
by etaoin22
Rudy is having a MUCH worse night.

Re: To put things in perspective, test-takers

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:37 pm
by gsabc
etaoin22 wrote:Rudy is having a MUCH worse night.
He deserves it. His method of campaigning runs a close second in stupidity to Thompson's.

WE, on the other hand, did not deserve that insane J! test. :P

Re: To put things in perspective, test-takers

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:56 pm
by etaoin22
gsabc wrote:
etaoin22 wrote:Rudy is having a MUCH worse night.
He deserves it. His method of campaigning runs a close second in stupidity to Thompson's.

WE, on the other hand, did not deserve that insane J! test. :P
As far as the test, I made a strategic misjudgment, I feel. I didn't really want to do it, being among other things a bit under the weather. I made the choice that if Toronto showed up as a potential audition city, I would take ithe test, seeing as I had never seen a J! practice test which I didnt pass with at least 5-8 marks to spare.

In the long perspective, I should have tried harder to get on J! before this testing process hit the Internet. In the final year of the non-net-pool, they called LOTS of Canadians in the final three months of games, and there were many episodes which -- absent brain-frying -- I would have aced. (Even taking into account some hot-podium effect..)

Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:20 pm
by Beebs52
I just registered. I figure I have no meetings tomorrow and Jeff will be home with the computer. I'll see how far my brain has deteriorated since my last test where I passed and thought I wowed them. Apparently I was wrong.

Oh, shutup.

Re: To put things in perspective, test-takers

Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 7:00 am
by peacock2121
etaoin22 wrote:Rudy is having a MUCH worse night.
LOL

Don't mind laughing at Rudy's expense.