If the election were held today, for whom would you vote?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply

If the election were held today, who would you vote for?

Clinton, Hillary
10
23%
Edwards, John
1
2%
Giuliani, Rudy
1
2%
Gravel, Mike
0
No votes
Huckabee, Mike
3
7%
Hunter, Duncan
1
2%
Keyes, Alan
0
No votes
Kucinich, Dennis
1
2%
McCain, John
3
7%
Obama, Barack
10
23%
Paul, Ron
0
No votes
Richardson, Bill
3
7%
Romney, Mitt
1
2%
Thompson, Fred
4
9%
WGAS
6
14%
 
Total votes: 44

Message
Author
User avatar
Spelling Police
Merry Man
Posts: 14
Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 11:20 am
Location: Watching you

If the election were held today, for whom would you vote?

#1 Post by Spelling Police » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:25 pm

If the election were held today, for whom would you vote?
Last edited by Spelling Police on Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:33 pm, edited 2 times in total.
when the sound is ee
it's i before e
except after c

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#2 Post by peacock2121 » Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:29 pm

It's "for whom would you vote"?

User avatar
TheConfessor
Posts: 6462
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 1:11 pm

#3 Post by TheConfessor » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:32 pm

Questions like this are pointless. There will never be an election with all of these names on the same ballot. Give me a valid matchup and I'll think about it.

Actually, I like the sound of a Hunter-Thompson ticket.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#4 Post by ne1410s » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:49 pm

Questions like this are pointless. There will never be an election with all of these names on the same ballot. Give me a valid matchup and I'll think about it.
Well, aren't you just the little Debbie Downer...wahn wahn.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#5 Post by fantine33 » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:57 pm

Earlier today, my ballot was filled out as follows:

Anthony Bosh
Nene Pierce
Iverson Miller
Nash Gordon
Camby Howard

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 26510
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#6 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Jan 07, 2008 6:58 pm

TheConfessor wrote:Questions like this are pointless. There will never be an election with all of these names on the same ballot. Give me a valid matchup and I'll think about it.

Actually, I like the sound of a Hunter-Thompson ticket.
How about Hunter S. Thompson? Yeah, I know he's dead - would cause less trouble.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
NellyLunatic1980
Posts: 7935
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:54 am
Contact:

#7 Post by NellyLunatic1980 » Tue Jan 08, 2008 5:22 am

WGAS is beating out Rotten Rudy... LOL!

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7619
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

#8 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Jan 08, 2008 8:16 pm

Headline: Thompson leads Republican Field, loses to WGAS.
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

Post Reply