A game play suggestion
Posted: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:30 pm
If players post their answers using spoiler tags. then they won't be visible unless someone intentionally looks at them.
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
I agree wholeheartedly with this suggestion.eyégor wrote:If players post their answers using spoiler tags. then they won't be visible unless someone intentionally looks at them.
Just a thought.
Holy cow! I barely got here, and Cal's disagreeing with me already!!TheCalvinator24 wrote:I don't understand why there is any greate problem than ever. Is the game host puts spoiler space in the question post, then the answers wouldn't be seen anyway.Spoiler
Sounds like a good idea, but I can guarantee that many will forget to tag their answers.
I'm not really disagreeing.SportsFan68 wrote:Holy cow! I barely got here, and Cal's disagreeing with me already!!TheCalvinator24 wrote:I don't understand why there is any greate problem than ever. Is the game host puts spoiler space in the question post, then the answers wouldn't be seen anyway.Spoiler
Sounds like a good idea, but I can guarantee that many will forget to tag their answers.
Just like old times.
Because there's no flat view, post to post. It's easy to go zooming with the speed of light into stuff you may not want to view in threaded view, even with spoiler space.TheCalvinator24 wrote: I do think it's a good suggestion.
I'm just not sure why it's a bigger problem her than it was before.
I wanted to, and I wasn't afraid.SportsFan68 wrote: How come you changed your avatar back?
When you open the reply window, there are a row of buttons under the subject line, starting with B i and u. The rightmost one is "Spoiler".christie1111 wrote:But how do you do the spoiler thingie?
I see how to hide/unhide but how do you put that in your reply?
It is early over here.
peacock2121 wrote:Spoiler
Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?
The object is to avoid seeing anyone else's answer, when the Bored only serves entire threads instead of individual messages. There have been three different suggestions to handle this.peacock2121 wrote: Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?
peacock2121 wrote:Spoiler
Okay - can someone tell me why this is better than responding by quoting?
You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.
Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.
apparentlyBob Juch wrote:You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.
Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.
I see three at once.peacock2121 wrote:apparentlyBob Juch wrote:You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.peacock2121 wrote:I don't think I have ever seen a second post in a thread without scrolling down.
Doesn't mean I haven't, just seems to me that the avatar and the header of the bored prevents that.
I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.
Bob Juch wrote:I see three at once.peacock2121 wrote:apparentlyBob Juch wrote: You apparently have a small screen size. Mine is 1920x1200.
I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.
Some people are regressing.littlebeast13 wrote:This is like an infinite regression....Bob Juch wrote:I see three at once.peacock2121 wrote: apparently
I have yet to find a post where I do not have to scroll down to see the second post in a thread.
lb13