Page 1 of 2
Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:24 am
by dimmzy
Just happened to tune in ... it's like Jimmy Stewart showed up ... stuttering, deer in the headlights, avoiding the questions.
I think he's having an emotional meltdown.
The presidency must be getting to him ... just like with us.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:25 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
The man has always been an idiot.
I take comfort in knowing that I never voted for him.
Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:29 am
by earendel
dimmzy wrote:Just happened to tune in ... it's like Jimmy Stewart showed up ... stuttering, deer in the headlights, avoiding the questions.
I think he's having an emotional meltdown.
The presidency must be getting to him ... just like with us.
Leaving aside personal opinion about the president, he has never been known as a gifted orator. At times he can be good enough, but extemporaneous speaking is not his strong suit by any means.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:46 am
by NellyLunatic1980
No other man in presidential history can talk so much without ever actually saying anything.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:50 am
by mrkelley23
Yes.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 10:41 am
by peacock2121
See, this is like asking was Bubba always a womanizer and an adulterer?
We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:10 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
peacock2121 wrote:We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.
I didn't elect him.

Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:22 am
by peacock2121
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:peacock2121 wrote:We knew it when we elected him and we knew of Dubya's difficulty with public speaking and pronunciation when we elected him.
I didn't elect him.

Oh, but we did. You voted and he got elected - we elected him. That is the way our government works. You may not have voted for him and we elected him.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:26 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
I love hearing my mother talk about Bush. She voted for him and even worked on his campaign.
She bitches about him all of the time now.
Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:28 am
by megaaddict
Yes, he's always done poorly, but despite eight years of experience, he's apparently getting worse at it.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:30 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.
The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:31 am
by Appa23
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.
The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Re: Was Bush always this bad at press conferences?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:35 am
by dimmzy
megaaddict wrote:Yes, he's always done poorly, but despite eight years of experience, he's apparently getting worse at it.
YES! That's what I find amazing! He never learns!
Oh wait, we didn't either ...
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:38 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
Appa23 wrote:PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.
The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:44 am
by Appa23
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:Appa23 wrote:PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:I have seen comments made in gossip columns that he might be drinking again.
The job is enough to make anyone drink.
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.
Isn't that the guy on E!?
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 11:47 am
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
Appa23 wrote:PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:Appa23 wrote:
Another tmz.com story, no doubt.
Actually, Ted Casablancas.
Isn't that the guy on E!?
Yes, he has a daily column.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:49 pm
by ne1410s
Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?
I'm just saying...
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:51 pm
by peacock2121
ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?
I'm just saying...
Even if I go with that way of saying it..... we elected him after we had 4 years of him
after
he was appointed.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 1:58 pm
by Appa23
ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?
I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:08 pm
by PlacentiaSoccerMom
Appa23 wrote:ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?
I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.
Just imagine if the Supreme Court had gone the other way, after all, Gore did win the popular vote.
How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers? The soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan? Innocent Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire?
To their families it made have made a huge difference.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:11 pm
by gsabc
Appa23 wrote:ne1410s wrote:Actually, wasn't he elected once and appointed once?
I'm just saying...
I wonder if in 2027 there still be be people whining and refusing to accept that Gore/Lieberman lost.
Depends if in 2027 Iraq is a terrorist sanctuary and Tel Aviv is a radioactive hole from an Iranian nuke ...
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:14 pm
by silvercamaro
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
Just imagine if the Supreme Court had gone the other way, after all, Gore did win the popular vote.
How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers? The soldiers who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan? Innocent Iraqi civilians caught in the crossfire?
To their families it made have made a huge difference.
Or, how many more of us would be dead? To our families it would make a huge difference. We simply do not know what the alternative consequences would have been.
I sometimes listen to Bush and shake my head. Then I remember the other candidates, and think, "Oh. Never mind."
[/quote]
Top 1 list of George W. Bush's Presidency:
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:15 pm
by Rexer25
1. He made his father's term of office look not so bad.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:16 pm
by mrkelley23
To answer Appa's question, I imagine it will be much as it is today: the vast majority of folks convinced that those who think Gore won are just a bunch of discontented whiners.
Serious students of history, however, may very well ferret out the serious voting irregularities in Florida and Ohio. The consensus may even be, among scholars, that the election of 2000 went the wrong way.
Ridiculous, you say? Check out the election of 1876 for parallels, right down to Florida being the crucial state.
Posted: Tue Dec 04, 2007 2:22 pm
by Rexer25
...
PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
How many people would still be alive? The people in the Twin Towers?
...
I think the Sept. 11 attacks would have happened, no matter who was in office. Unless G.W. Bush had died suddenly upon taking office. Then there would be two smoking, glowing devastated areas where Baghdad and Tehran used to be.