WWTBAM Bored

I know this is going to make me unpopular with the majority of this Bored but it has to be said...

GO CARDS!!!!!!!!!!!!!


It's always better to root for the underdogs and these guys'll be up against it almost as bad as my Giants last year. Plus, according to multiple reports, Mrs. Warner promised the kids a puppy if Kurt wins the Super Bowl, so if you're on the fence and you root for the Steelers you're rooting for children to not get a puppy. You sick sick bastards!

Now I notice some of the members of the Bored are already taking sides and no offense meant but Sprots I'm calling you out! (It's really a compliment 'cuz I know you can take it.) Now I'm okay with the fact that you want to root for the Steelers and post celebratory threads about them because your team's not in the playoffs however:

We'd be way more ahead if not for that one. Sigh.

You do NOT get to use "We" for a team you are rooting for in the playoffs. "We" is for your team and your team alone. It's like you're cheating on your Broncos Sprots...What will Ms. Christie think???

So if you think that Unfaithful Puppy Haters should be stomped out then let's hear from you! Join me in wearing Red on February the 1st. My posts until then will be in the appropriate color to show my support...

Well, okay, but your new avatar is not nearly as cute as Kayla.

FTR, I don't care who wins, but I care about the puppies.

I will be rooting for the Cardinals, but not so much for Kurt Warner.... and most certainly not for ^*#&^@ Brenda Warner. Call me callous, but those two drove me nuts the entire time they were in St. Louis....

I can, however, tolerate them more than I can the Stillers and their fans though (No offense to MOST of their fans here).... so here's a lukewarm......


go cardinals....


lb13

You and your red team are going down, down and down.

There were three birds and Men of Steel in the final four.

Who do really think is emerging victoriously from that group.

Now...where's Bill Leavy? We have a job for him...

Man, you guys really don't want any new fans, do ya?

Go Cards.

After the Colts got ROBBED by the zebra contingent, I more or less defaulted to the Cardinals...

...couldn't root for Philly...I live in Cowboy country
...couldn't root for Baltimore...they took the Colts from Miami first and Dallas later, and the Browns from Cleveland, and STILL have the nerve to hold a grudge against Indy
...couldn't root for the Steelers...even with the old family connection...I can't ever forget '95 or '05 playoffs

...Edgerrin James is a Cardinal, and was a Colt...and I like Father Time the QB...although it kills me to say that, since he'e only a year older than me

O.K. I'm on board.

Go Cards!

BackInTex wrote:O.K. I'm on board.

Go Cards!

LOL.

I find it impossible to root for the Cardinals after they mailed in their regular season game against the Patriots. With the division already won and no chance of changing their seeding for the playoffs, they essentially played an exhibition game. Took the QB out in the second quarter, used their backup players for much of the game, and generally played like it was still the first week in August and they didn't know which plays worked yet. For those who dished out the dollars to see a professional football game, they got only half of one because one team didn't choose to be professional.

gsabc wrote:I find it impossible to root for the Cardinals after they mailed in their regular season game against the Patriots. With the division already won and no chance of changing their seeding for the playoffs, they essentially played an exhibition game. Took the QB out in the second quarter, used their backup players for much of the game, and generally played like it was still the first week in August and they didn't know which plays worked yet. For those who dished out the dollars to see a professional football game, they got only half of one because one team didn't choose to be professional.

And had Warner broke his leg in the 3rd quarter the cry from everyone would be "Why was he in the game? A win meant nothing to them!"

I think they were professional. Had they played to win, it would have been for exhibition purposes only.

I will be rooting heavily for the Cards in the Super Bowl. I'm just glad it didn't turn out to be an Eagles-Steelers matchup (two teams that I hate with a passion).

Go Cardinals!!!!

BackInTex wrote:

gsabc wrote:I find it impossible to root for the Cardinals after they mailed in their regular season game against the Patriots. With the division already won and no chance of changing their seeding for the playoffs, they essentially played an exhibition game. Took the QB out in the second quarter, used their backup players for much of the game, and generally played like it was still the first week in August and they didn't know which plays worked yet. For those who dished out the dollars to see a professional football game, they got only half of one because one team didn't choose to be professional.

And had Warner broke his leg in the 3rd quarter the cry from everyone would be "Why was he in the game? A win meant nothing to them!"

By that logic, he shouldn't have played in any of the remaining games, either.

With the money that the players make and the money that the fans shell out to see the game in person, the expectation when you arrive is that the players, and coaches, of both teams on the field will be trying their hardest to win every game. The Cardinals weren't on that day, not by a long shot.

Since the Giants aren't playing, I'm pulling for the team with a Georgia Tech man for their coach.

It's interesting that everyone kept talking about how the Eagles were "this year's Giants." The only thing the Eagles had in common with last year's Giants were that both were wild card teams that would have needed to win three games on the road to go to the Super Bowl. The Giants pretty much sputtered their way through the last half of the season last year (the same way they sputtered through the last quarter of this year's season), only playing well in the season ending finale, a loss, against New England. The Eagles went into the playoffs a hot team.

On the other hand, the Cards did seem more like the Giants. This was a team that was highly suspect, one that went 3-7 outside of its own division and suffered some ugly losses, the worst coming in New England the next to last week of the season. No one gave them a chance and they got this far (they did have two home games, but were underdogs in both of them). My head tells me they don't stand much of a chance against the Steelers, but Pittsburgh does not have a dynamic offense, and if the Cards don't make mistakes, they could keep it close enough for something to happen in the fourth quarter.

gsabc wrote:I find it impossible to root for the Cardinals after they mailed in their regular season game against the Patriots. With the division already won and no chance of changing their seeding for the playoffs, they essentially played an exhibition game. Took the QB out in the second quarter, used their backup players for much of the game, and generally played like it was still the first week in August and they didn't know which plays worked yet. For those who dished out the dollars to see a professional football game, they got only half of one because one team didn't choose to be professional.

Would the fans in New England have felt better about "getting their money's worth" if the Cards had played all out and won the game, knocking the Pats out of the playoffs (I know they didn't make it anyway, but beating the Cards gave them another week of chances)?

gsabc wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

gsabc wrote:I find it impossible to root for the Cardinals after they mailed in their regular season game against the Patriots. With the division already won and no chance of changing their seeding for the playoffs, they essentially played an exhibition game. Took the QB out in the second quarter, used their backup players for much of the game, and generally played like it was still the first week in August and they didn't know which plays worked yet. For those who dished out the dollars to see a professional football game, they got only half of one because one team didn't choose to be professional.

And had Warner broke his leg in the 3rd quarter the cry from everyone would be "Why was he in the game? A win meant nothing to them!"

By that logic, he shouldn't have played in any of the remaining games, either.

That logic also takes into account the 'playing in a raging blizzard' factor. Yours does not.

gsabc wrote: With the money that the players make and the money that the fans shell out to see the game in person, the expectation when you arrive is that the players, and coaches, of both teams on the field will be trying their hardest to win every game. The Cardinals weren't on that day, not by a long shot.

Um, no. The expectation is that they play to make it to, and win, the Super Bowl. In most cases that means play to win the game. But not always.

That avatar is very funny.

starfish1113 wrote:Man, you guys really don't want any new fans, do ya?

Go Cards.

Steelers don't "want" for fans, starfish!!!

I finally have support thanks people
Mac the only Cardinal fan all this season on the bored

macrae1234 wrote:I finally have support thanks people
Mac the only Cardinal fan all this season on the bored

Do you want bandwagon peeps or not?

peacock2121 wrote:

macrae1234 wrote:I finally have support thanks people
Mac the only Cardinal fan all this season on the bored

Do you want bandwagon peeps or not?

I have not changed. I have been against the Steelers winning the Super Bowl all season.

clem21 wrote: You do NOT get to use "We" for a team you are rooting for in the playoffs. "We" is for your team and your team alone. It's like you're cheating on your Broncos Sprots...What will Ms. Christie think???

Ms. Christie is a married type person, so she understands the Rule of the Second "Us" Team. (If it sounds like I just made up the name, well, yes, I did.)

Once your team goes out, if you are a married type person, you are automatically qualified to cabbage on to your spouse's team as your Second "Us" Team, for the purposes of saying "We this" or "We that" or "Such and such happened to us" until that team goes out, which, upon that happening, you don't have an "Us" Team until next year when we start over.

When the Stillers or Pirates or Pens go out, and we're still in, SteelersFan is a Broncos, Rockies, or Avalanche fan by virtue of the Second "Us" Team rule.

Thanks for the opportunity to introduce this exciting concept under the brilliant and original name I just invented.

SportsFan68 wrote:

clem21 wrote: You do NOT get to use "We" for a team you are rooting for in the playoffs. "We" is for your team and your team alone. It's like you're cheating on your Broncos Sprots...What will Ms. Christie think???

Ms. Christie is a married type person, so she understands the Rule of the Second "Us" Team. (If it sounds like I just made up the name, well, yes, I did.)

Once your team goes out, if you are a married type person, you are automatically qualified to cabbage on to your spouse's team as your Second "Us" Team, for the purposes of saying "We this" or "We that" or "Such and such happened to us" until that team goes out, which, upon that happening, you don't have an "Us" Team until next year when we start over.

When the Stillers or Pirates or Pens go out, and we're still in, SteelersFan is a Broncos, Rockies, or Avalanche fan by virtue of the Second "Us" Team rule.

Thanks for the opportunity to introduce this exciting concept under the brilliant and original name I just invented.

Now dubbed the SUT rule.

BackInTex wrote: Now dubbed the SUT rule.

I should add an "I" in there so it would be the SUIT Rule. How about:

Section "Us" In Triumph Team -- SUITT