Page 1 of 2
Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 5:09 am
by silverscreenselect
According to Sports Illustrated, since the Super Bowl era began, teams that throw four or more interceptions in the NFL playoffs have a combined record of 1-41, the 41st being the Carolina Panthers (the 40th being the Dolphins the week before). The only time a team with four interceptions won a game was Buffalo in 1981, who beat a Jets team that also threw four interceptions in the same game.
Teams that throw one or no interceptions in a playoff game win 70% of their games. Teams that throw two or more interceptions in a playoff game win only 30% of their games.Teams that have fewer interceptions than their opponents win 82% of the games.
The two best quarterbacks at avoiding interceptions in the playoffs were Bart Starr and Tom Brady, who both were fairly successful.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 6:24 am
by peacock2121
They lost because the other team scored more points.
You can now speculate about why the other team scored more points.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 7:27 am
by etaoin22
Interceptions are an epiphenomenon, for the most part, teams are getting beat in the trenches, and then failures with the skill players follow. I did not watch Carolina, so it might have been Delhomme stinkology, but skill player failures I believe correlate with "pressure" -- not BIlly Joel song pressure, just 300 pound guy is going to run into you as hard as he possibly can pressure.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 8:09 am
by littlebeast13
peacock2121 wrote:They lost because the other team scored more points.
You can now speculate about why the other team scored more points.
Pea stole the smartass answer I was going to give....
lb13
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:16 am
by peacock2121
littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:They lost because the other team scored more points.
You can now speculate about why the other team scored more points.
Pea stole the smartass answer I was going to give....
lb13
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:20 am
by littlebeast13
peacock2121 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:They lost because the other team scored more points.
You can now speculate about why the other team scored more points.
Pea stole the smartass answer I was going to give....
lb13
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:30 am
by ulysses5019
littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:
Pea stole the smartass answer I was going to give....
lb13
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
You're making my head spin.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:31 am
by minimetoo26
ulysses5019 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
You're making my head spin.
That's because we're dumbasses, I suppose...
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:32 am
by macrae1234
I said to friends before the game the key was to neutralize 2 people Julius Peppers on defense and Steve Smith on offense. If the Panthers do not get a good pass rush their secondary is vulnerable. If Smith isn't open for a key third down conversion their offense stalls. I guess Grimm and Pendergast thought so also.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:38 am
by ulysses5019
minimetoo26 wrote:ulysses5019 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
You're making my head spin.
That's because we're dumbasses, I suppose...
Don't forget my nasty-ass Big Mac.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:41 am
by minimetoo26
ulysses5019 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:ulysses5019 wrote:
You're making my head spin.
That's because we're dumbasses, I suppose...
Don't forget my nasty-ass Big Mac.
How can I? The cholesterol is oozing...
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:44 am
by peacock2121
littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:
Pea stole the smartass answer I was going to give....
lb13
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
One needs to be able to act like a smartass to give a smartass answer. One does not need to be a smartass in order to act like one.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:44 am
by peacock2121
ulysses5019 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:
I know you are not calling me a smartass. You are calling my answer smartassish.
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
You're making my head spin.
Clockwise or counter-clockwise?
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:45 am
by peacock2121
macrae1234 wrote:I said to friends before the game the key was to neutralize 2 people Julius Peepers on defense and Steve Smith on offense. If the Panthers do not get a good pass rush their secondary is vulnerable. If Smith isn't open for a key third down conversion their offense stalls. I guess Grimm and Pendergast thought so also.
So cute, trying to be serious and all.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:46 am
by moonie
It was also Jake Delhomme's birthday.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:47 am
by peacock2121
moonie wrote:It was also Jake Delhomme's birthday.
That's the reason!
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:54 am
by littlebeast13
peacock2121 wrote:moonie wrote:It was also Jake Delhomme's birthday.
That's the reason!
Nope, not if Delhomme's birthday was still January 10th 5 years ago. They beat the Rams in double OT 5 years ago yesterday while I was at home suffering from the after-effects of my kidney stone blasting....
lb13
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 9:57 am
by ulysses5019
peacock2121 wrote:ulysses5019 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:
That depends on whether you believe it takes a smartass to give a smartassish answer or not......
lb13
You're making my head spin.
Clockwise or counter-clockwise?
You be the judge:
http://gallery.krunk4ever.com/v/Animate ... r.gif.html
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:07 am
by peacock2121
You don't have 2 heads to go 2 different ways.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:48 am
by BigDrawMan
jake has had a few games like that this year.I think he was 7 of 25 with 4 picks vs Oakland..
I like what baltomo did.Run it on 3rd and 8 on your side of the field and let your defense win it.
the stillers should do the same.its like poker.patience beats riskiness.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 10:58 am
by Tocqueville3
BigDrawMan wrote:jake has had a few games like that this year.I think he was 7 of 25 with 4 picks vs Oakland..
I like what baltomo did.Run it on 3rd and 8 on your side of the field and let your defense win it.
the stillers should do the same.its like poker.patience beats riskiness.
Somebody ought to tell Les Miles that.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:19 am
by themanintheseersuckersuit
now I am hoping "epiphenomenon" will show up as a Sploofus answer.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:34 am
by SportsFan68
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:now I am hoping "epiphenomenon" will show up as a Sploofus answer.
Me too! I looked it up.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 11:54 am
by silverscreenselect
macrae1234 wrote:I said to friends before the game the key was to neutralize 2 people Julius Peepers on defense...
I always thought that was Wally Cox's best role.
Re: Why the Panthers Lost
Posted: Sun Jan 11, 2009 12:27 pm
by macrae1234
I always thought that was Wally Cox's best role.
smartass it was Robinson Peepers