Blago impeached
Posted: Fri Jan 09, 2009 11:07 am
I just read that the Illinois house impeached Blago by a vote of 114 to 1. Full report is here: http://www.ilga.gov/house/committees/Do ... mittee.pdf
I was wondering the same thing. I'll try to find his/her/its name....NellyLunatic1980 wrote:So which moron voted not to impeach Blago? And how much did Blago pay him/her?
That's only half the battle - the Illinois Senate still has to try and convict him in order for him to be removed from office. It may be harder than it sounds; I suspect the FBI might be reluctant to release some of the evidence they have because it could compromise their investigation.danielh41 wrote:I just read that the Illinois house impeached Blago by a vote of 114 to 1. Full report is here: http://www.ilga.gov/house/committees/Do ... mittee.pdf
It was Milton Patterson (D-Chicago). Here's a news story with his explanation:starfish1113 wrote:I was wondering the same thing. I'll try to find his/her/its name....NellyLunatic1980 wrote:So which moron voted not to impeach Blago? And how much did Blago pay him/her?
What is it with politicians and their utter cowardice?State Rep. Elga Jefferies -- another Chicago Democrat -- voted "present."
Impeachment is the equivalent to an indictment. An indictment is statement formally charging a person with a crime based on presented evidence. It is usually necessary before having a trial to determine if the person is guilty or innocent of the charge. An impeachment is typically the lower legislative body accusing a government official of some wrongdoing and recommending that the upper body have a trial to determine guilt or innocence.peacock2121 wrote:Isn't indictment from a prosecutor a different animal than impeachment?
You wonder why she votes present...Jeemie wrote:What is it with politicians and their utter cowardice?State Rep. Elga Jefferies -- another Chicago Democrat -- voted "present."
Take a friggin' stand!
I respect Patterson more for his stance than I do Jeffries, even if I disagree with him.
I get it - they didn't have their version of The Starr Report.andrewjackson wrote:Impeachment is the equivalent to an indictment. An indictment is statement formally charging a person with a crime based on presented evidence. It is usually necessary before having a trial to determine if the person is guilty or innocent of the charge. An impeachment is typically the lower legislative body accusing a government official of some wrongdoing and recommending that the upper body have a trial to determine guilt or innocence.peacock2121 wrote:Isn't indictment from a prosecutor a different animal than impeachment?
I guess you could say it is different because a grand jury that issues an indictment has actually seen the evidence while in this case most of the Illinois House members have actually only seen the report from the House Impeachment Committee.
peacock2121 wrote:I get it - they didn't have their version of The Starr Report.
True, but they couldn't seem to get their act together to impeach him any faster. --BobBigDrawMan wrote:it is wrong to impeach him right after christmas