WWTBAM Bored

My friend is up for Geezer Jock.

Women 50-59, Liz.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Thanks for voting if you feel like it. She says she will share the beer with us.

I put mine in. Go Geezers!

59 is a Geezer? Yikes! Oh well, I voted for her anyway.

kayrharris wrote:59 is a Geezer? Yikes! Oh well, I voted for her anyway.

Ha. 40 is a Geezer, on their slate.

I voted, good luck to her.

Done.

Ritterskoop wrote:My friend is up for Geezer Jock.

Women 50-59, Liz.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Thanks for voting if you feel like it. She says she will share the beer with us.

NC is full of Geezerjock Chicks - Susan in the 40-49 bracket is a friend of my swim coach and worthy of a vote if you get a chance.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Ritterskoop wrote:

kayrharris wrote:59 is a Geezer? Yikes! Oh well, I voted for her anyway.

Ha. 40 is a Geezer, on their slate.

These people all died to TV advertisers 6 years ago

Voted.

gotribego26 wrote:

Ritterskoop wrote:My friend is up for Geezer Jock.

Women 50-59, Liz.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Thanks for voting if you feel like it. She says she will share the beer with us.

NC is full of Geezerjock Chicks - Susan in the 40-49 bracket is someone is a friend of my swim coach and worthy of a vote if you get a chance.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Yay! I can vote for tribe's bud without hurting my bud. Different groups.

I voted for Tribe's bud. Are we limited to one vote?

Ritterskoop wrote: Yay! I can vote for tribe's bud without hurting my bud. Different groups.

When I first saw your post I thought we were voting for the same geezer!! Then I realized we had multiple geezers in the vicinity - good for them!!

kayrharris wrote:I voted for Tribe's bud. Are we limited to one vote?

I've voted for Liz several times. Go for it!

I voted for both Liz and Susan. Good luck to them!

gotribego26 wrote:

Ritterskoop wrote:My friend is up for Geezer Jock.

Women 50-59, Liz.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

Thanks for voting if you feel like it. She says she will share the beer with us.

NC is full of Geezerjock Chicks - Susan in the 40-49 bracket is a friend of my swim coach and worthy of a vote if you get a chance.

http://www.geezerjock.com/public/418.cfm

I voted for Susan as well.

I voted for both.

What's with the write in thingie - am I suppose to pick one for overall?

peacock2121 wrote:I voted for both.

What's with the write in thingie - am I suppose to pick one for overall?

I think that there will be prizes for each category and an overall winner as well. Give that we have two names with BB connections, how would one decide which one to put in that space?

earendel wrote:

peacock2121 wrote:I voted for both.

What's with the write in thingie - am I suppose to pick one for overall?

I think that there will be prizes for each category and an overall winner as well. Give that we have two names with BB connections, how would one decide which one to put in that space?

You could divide evenly.

You could not vote in that area at all.

You could decide if you want to support skoop's friend or tribe's friend.

You could decide if you want the older lady to win or the younger lady to win

I am sure there are other ways to decide that I have not thought of.

peacock2121 wrote:

earendel wrote:

peacock2121 wrote:I voted for both.

What's with the write in thingie - am I suppose to pick one for overall?

I think that there will be prizes for each category and an overall winner as well. Give that we have two names with BB connections, how would one decide which one to put in that space?

You could divide evenly.

You could not vote in that area at all.

You could decide if you want to support skoop's friend or tribe's friend.

You could decide if you want the older lady to win or the younger lady to win

I am sure there are other ways to decide that I have not thought of.

I chose your second option.

The great thing is - if you choose another one, no one needs to know!

So I'm a geezer. And not even a jock to soften the blow.

Okay, I've voted for both those geezer chicks, even of one of them is likely younger than I am.

I should just take my Geritol and crawl back into bed now. Nurse my arthritis and whatever all I should have being a geezer...

There's a thing at the top of the page, takes you to the main page where there are short bios on the athletes.

peacock2121 wrote:

earendel wrote:

peacock2121 wrote:I voted for both.

What's with the write in thingie - am I suppose to pick one for overall?

I think that there will be prizes for each category and an overall winner as well. Give that we have two names with BB connections, how would one decide which one to put in that space?

You could divide evenly.

You could not vote in that area at all.

You could decide if you want to support skoop's friend or tribe's friend.

You could decide if you want the older lady to win or the younger lady to win

I am sure there are other ways to decide that I have not thought of.

I usually like to vote for the person whom I think is most deserving.

Call me crazy.

P.S. I may have to check, but Cathy Noth might have a Nebraska connection.

Appa23 wrote:
I usually like to vote for the person whom I think is most deserving.

Call me crazy.

Unless you found how to read the bios, there was no way for anyone to know who was most deserving. It was just a list of names of strangers.

Ritterskoop wrote:

Appa23 wrote:
I usually like to vote for the person whom I think is most deserving.

Call me crazy.

Unless you found how to read the bios, there was no way for anyone to know who was most deserving. It was just a list of names of strangers.

I did. As you noted, there is a link right at the top. Why would I vote for anything without evaluating the merits?

I admit that I have a bias for some sports over others, so some achievements were more impressive to me than others.

Appa23 wrote:

Ritterskoop wrote:

Appa23 wrote:
I usually like to vote for the person whom I think is most deserving.

Call me crazy.

Unless you found how to read the bios, there was no way for anyone to know who was most deserving. It was just a list of names of strangers.

I did. As you noted, there is a link right at the top. Why would I vote for anything without evaluating the merits?

I admit that I have a bias for some sports over others, so some achievements were more impressive to me than others.

For some of us, knowing the person was merit enough. And for some others, knowing we endorsed those people was merit enough.