TAR discussion thread

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13881
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

TAR discussion thread

#1 Post by earendel » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:05 am

I realize that we haven't had our weekly discussion thread in which vandal would run down his list of teams and rank them, and this is not intended as a substitute for that. But something did happen last night that deserves comment, IMO.

The couples raced to a chicken farm and found their first clue, which included the second (and last) Fast Forward of the race. The FF required the couples to travel to a restaurant and order a traditional Kazak meal. The first team to finish the meal would get the clue. Terence and Sarah, and Nick and Starr opted to try the FF; when they got the food it turned out to contain meat. Terence said that he had been a vegetarian for 15 years, but tried to eat the meal anyway. It was obvious fairly quickly that he wouldn't be able to do it, so they went back to do the road block that the other couples were doing. They ended up being the last team to arrive and were eliminated.

Here's the question I had: Terence's vegetarianism was probably a matter of principle, yet he was willing to compromise those principles for a chance at $1 million. What does the Bored think about this decision?
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: TAR discussion thread

#2 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:09 am

earendel wrote:I realize that we haven't had our weekly discussion thread in which vandal would run down his list of teams and rank them, and this is not intended as a substitute for that. But something did happen last night that deserves comment, IMO.

The couples raced to a chicken farm and found their first clue, which included the second (and last) Fast Forward of the race. The FF required the couples to travel to a restaurant and order a traditional Kazak meal. The first team to finish the meal would get the clue. Terence and Sarah, and Nick and Starr opted to try the FF; when they got the food it turned out to contain meat. Terence said that he had been a vegetarian for 15 years, but tried to eat the meal anyway. It was obvious fairly quickly that he wouldn't be able to do it, so they went back to do the road block that the other couples were doing. They ended up being the last team to arrive and were eliminated.

Here's the question I had: Terence's vegetarianism was probably a matter of principle, yet he was willing to compromise those principles for a chance at $1 million. What does the Bored think about this decision?
I didn't watch the whole show, so I don't know the context. Did he say why he is a vegetarian? Is it he just doesn't like meat? Or religous reason? Animal rights reasons? Other reasons?

I mean if he just doesn't like it and then was willing to try it for the money, that's one thing. I wouldn't say I like eating bugs but I would try to do it for a million. I guess it depends if he's truly compromising his principles, or whether he is just tolerating something unpleasant. So my reaction to it depends on knowing the story behind his choice.

User avatar
kusch
Posts: 1511
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 7:37 am

Re: TAR discussion thread

#3 Post by kusch » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:21 am

earendel wrote:I realize that we haven't had our weekly discussion thread in which vandal would run down his list of teams and rank them, and this is not intended as a substitute for that. But something did happen last night that deserves comment, IMO.

The couples raced to a chicken farm and found their first clue, which included the second (and last) Fast Forward of the race. The FF required the couples to travel to a restaurant and order a traditional Kazak meal. The first team to finish the meal would get the clue. Terence and Sarah, and Nick and Starr opted to try the FF; when they got the food it turned out to contain meat. Terence said that he had been a vegetarian for 15 years, but tried to eat the meal anyway. It was obvious fairly quickly that he wouldn't be able to do it, so they went back to do the road block that the other couples were doing. They ended up being the last team to arrive and were eliminated.

Here's the question I had: Terence's vegetarianism was probably a matter of principle, yet he was willing to compromise those principles for a chance at $1 million. What does the Bored think about this decision?
I watched and my thoughts on it are that he said he had not eaten meat for 15 years, thus I would not put a lot of "principle" into his decision to try the fast forward. So, I would say he did not comprise his principles. We really do not know why he no longer eats meat, so why bring in the "principle" thing? If of course if I missed his reason, I reserve the right to change my mind. :mrgreen:

User avatar
a1mamacat
Posts: 7134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:02 pm
Location: Great White North

Re: TAR discussion thread

#4 Post by a1mamacat » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:23 am

Hard to say about this one. He was such a prima donna anyway. I think, if it was a serious principal, he would have headed out right away after realising that meat was involved, rather than attempting to eat it.

I must say as well, that I am a little tired of Nick and Starr getting 1st all the time. I really really really want Toni and Dallas to get a first. The cow task was probably the funniest I have seen, and they had so much fun with it. True spririt of the race.

At this point, I think it is unlikely, but I really want Toni and Dallas to win. I think that the final 3 will be Nick and Starr, Toni and Dallas, and Ken and Tina. It appears that Dandrew will implode shortly.
Lover of Soft Animals and Fine Art
1st annual international BBBL Champeeeeen!

User avatar
earendel
Posts: 13881
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
Location: mired in the bureaucracy

Re: TAR discussion thread

#5 Post by earendel » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:30 am

a1mamacat wrote:Hard to say about this one. He was such a prima donna anyway. I think, if it was a serious principal, he would have headed out right away after realising that meat was involved, rather than attempting to eat it.

I must say as well, that I am a little tired of Nick and Starr getting 1st all the time. I really really really want Toni and Dallas to get a first. The cow task was probably the funniest I have seen, and they had so much fun with it. True spririt of the race.

At this point, I think it is unlikely, but I really want Toni and Dallas to win. I think that the final 3 will be Nick and Starr, Toni and Dallas, and Ken and Tina. It appears that Dandrew will implode shortly.
If I had my druthers I'd have Toni and Dallas win - which almost certainly means they won't. I agree that Nick and Starr have had more than their fair share of first place finishes, and they are looking mighty strong for the final. I'm guessing that next week will be another non-elimination leg.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."

User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

Re: TAR discussion thread

#6 Post by Sir_Galahad » Mon Nov 17, 2008 11:33 am

a1mamacat wrote:Hard to say about this one. He was such a prima donna anyway. I think, if it was a serious principal, he would have headed out right away after realising that meat was involved, rather than attempting to eat it.
Agreed.

I am also rooting for Toni and Dallas although Nick and Starr are looking very tough to beat (but may have a tough time next
based on the snippet they showed for next week's show).

I am anxiously waiting for them to open up the application process for season 15 as Steph (my step-daughter) and I are going to give it a shot. They have just started shooting Season 14 and we expect the application gate to open shortly.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: TAR discussion thread

#7 Post by Estonut » Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:13 pm

Does anyone recall more of the previous food challenges? It seems they have one a season. I remember a big bowl of egg (ostrich, I think) and BBQ meat (Romber). I think I remember some kind of raw squid/seafood dish and some kind of worm dish. There was one where they were eating some kind of soup, I think, and many of them hurled.

My point is that I only remember seeing food challenges that involved eating meat (except maybe the soup). A well-prepared team would be familiar with the show and would not have attempted such a restaurant challenge.

I also seem to recall that the vegetarian on a season of Survivor did not last long, at all.

User avatar
Hotseat Or Bust!
Bored Hottie
Posts: 1609
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 5:47 pm
Location: The Nutmeg State aka The Constitution State

Re: TAR discussion thread

#8 Post by Hotseat Or Bust! » Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:38 pm

Estonut wrote:Does anyone recall more of the previous food challenges? It seems they have one a season. I remember a big bowl of egg (ostrich, I think) and BBQ meat (Romber). I think I remember some kind of raw squid/seafood dish and some kind of worm dish. There was one where they were eating some kind of soup, I think, and many of them hurled.

My point is that I only remember seeing food challenges that involved eating meat (except maybe the soup). A well-prepared team would be familiar with the show and would not have attempted such a restaurant challenge.

I also seem to recall that the vegetarian on a season of Survivor did not last long, at all.
A few seasons back, the one with Charla and Mirna, when they went to Russia, one of the challenges was having to eat a large amount of caviar. As I recall, many contestants had a problem with it, but not Charla, she ate it rather quickly. I also remember an eating challenge in which quite a bit of sausage needed to be eaten, I think it was 2 0r 3? seasons ago.

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: TAR discussion thread

#9 Post by Estonut » Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:44 pm

Hotseat Or Bust! wrote:
Estonut wrote:Does anyone recall more of the previous food challenges? It seems they have one a season. I remember a big bowl of egg (ostrich, I think) and BBQ meat (Romber). I think I remember some kind of raw squid/seafood dish and some kind of worm dish. There was one where they were eating some kind of soup, I think, and many of them hurled.

My point is that I only remember seeing food challenges that involved eating meat (except maybe the soup). A well-prepared team would be familiar with the show and would not have attempted such a restaurant challenge.

I also seem to recall that the vegetarian on a season of Survivor did not last long, at all.
A few seasons back, the one with Charla and Mirna, when they went to Russia, one of the challenges was having to eat a large amount of caviar. As I recall, many contestants had a problem with it, but not Charla, she ate it rather quickly. I also remember an eating challenge in which quite a bit of sausage needed to be eaten, I think it was 2 0r 3? seasons ago.
Those both ring a bell. The caviar may be the one I was thinking might have been soup. Was it served in big bowls, were they all sitting around the same long table and did several contestants puke? I definitely remember a challenge where they had to grind meat and make sausage. There were many jokes made about the product. Was the eating part of that one, or a separate challenge/season altogether?

User avatar
jsuchard
Posts: 295
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:01 am
Location: Close enough to Disneyland to hear the fireworks

Re: TAR discussion thread

#10 Post by jsuchard » Mon Nov 17, 2008 5:58 pm

There was a soup-eating task a few seasons back. I think it was the year with the major ass-hole married to the former Playboy playmate.

They were in Hungary (probably Budapest) and they had to eat a very large portion of a very spicy-hot, paprika-based soup. Several contestants vomited, but kept right on going.

I've always thought it would be interesting if vomiting were not allowed and gave you a time penalty like other errors. That would make the contestants consider whether or not to re-cycle their vomit.
* Either Arglebargle IV or someone else.

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: TAR discussion thread

#11 Post by Estonut » Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:04 pm

jsuchard wrote:There was a soup-eating task a few seasons back. I think it was the year with the major ass-hole married to the former Playboy playmate.
Could you narrow it down, Doc? There's at least one of those each season! I do remember them, they had a website telling everyone how loving and non-abusive their relationship was.

jsuchard wrote:They were in Hungary (probably Budapest) and they had to eat a very large portion of a very spicy-hot, paprika-based soup. Several contestants vomited, but kept right on going.
OK, I am remembering correctly. This soup may have contained no meat. It's the only potentially-meatless challenge I can recall on TAR. It was astounding how those guys could puke and eat. Or eat while those next to them were wretching their guts out.

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: TAR discussion thread

#12 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 6:44 pm

Okay I just watched it and there really was no discussion about why he doesn't eat meat...

But they said it was made with fat from the rear end of a sheep...and meanwhile people are picking meat and slime from what looks like a sheep's head. I'm a meat lover but I'm not sure I would be able to stomach it, so I think it's probably a nastiness thing more than a true principle, if you haven't eaten meat in 15 years, I'm pretty sure you don't want to start with sheep's butt.

User avatar
mrkelley23
Posts: 6580
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair

Re: TAR discussion thread

#13 Post by mrkelley23 » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:33 pm

What I didn't get is why they sat there for so long after it became clear that prima donna was not going to be able to finish his portion. And it wasn't because they didn't know, because he kept stealing peeks at Starr and seeing that she was going through it quickly.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman

User avatar
sunflower
Bored Hooligan
Posts: 8010
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 11:32 am
Location: East Hartford, CT

Re: TAR discussion thread

#14 Post by sunflower » Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:37 pm

mrkelley23 wrote:What I didn't get is why they sat there for so long after it became clear that prima donna was not going to be able to finish his portion. And it wasn't because they didn't know, because he kept stealing peeks at Starr and seeing that she was going through it quickly.
Yeah that part definitely didn't make sense, they really should have left a lot sooner.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: TAR discussion thread

#15 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:44 am

earendel wrote:I realize that we haven't had our weekly discussion thread in which vandal would run down his list of teams and rank them, and this is not intended as a substitute for that. But something did happen last night that deserves comment, IMO.

The couples raced to a chicken farm and found their first clue, which included the second (and last) Fast Forward of the race. The FF required the couples to travel to a restaurant and order a traditional Kazak meal. The first team to finish the meal would get the clue. Terence and Sarah, and Nick and Starr opted to try the FF; when they got the food it turned out to contain meat. Terence said that he had been a vegetarian for 15 years, but tried to eat the meal anyway. It was obvious fairly quickly that he wouldn't be able to do it, so they went back to do the road block that the other couples were doing. They ended up being the last team to arrive and were eliminated.

Here's the question I had: Terence's vegetarianism was probably a matter of principle, yet he was willing to compromise those principles for a chance at $1 million. What does the Bored think about this decision?
I don't have a problem with his principle - I have a problem with how long it took him to say he wasn't going to do it.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

Re: TAR discussion thread

#16 Post by peacock2121 » Tue Nov 18, 2008 9:47 am

I also want to frat boys done - outta here - what a whiner - if it is about team - get your fat ass in gear and step up - stay with your partner.

User avatar
geoffil
Posts: 1566
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:43 am
Location: Chicago

Re: TAR discussion thread

#17 Post by geoffil » Tue Nov 18, 2008 7:57 pm

I read that Starr is a former Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader and her last name is Spangler.

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: TAR discussion thread

#18 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:33 am

Estonut wrote:Does anyone recall more of the previous food challenges? It seems they have one a season. I remember a big bowl of egg (ostrich, I think) and BBQ meat (Romber). I think I remember some kind of raw squid/seafood dish and some kind of worm dish. There was one where they were eating some kind of soup, I think, and many of them hurled.

My point is that I only remember seeing food challenges that involved eating meat (except maybe the soup). A well-prepared team would be familiar with the show and would not have attempted such a restaurant challenge.

I also seem to recall that the vegetarian on a season of Survivor did not last long, at all.
There was a FF in AR9 in Thailand that required racers to eat a large bowl of fried crickets/grasshoppers. Almost always seems to be a food challenge along the way.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: TAR discussion thread

#19 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:42 am

geoffil wrote:I read that Starr is a former Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader and her last name is Spangler.
Starr is her nickname (for obvious reasons given her last name, Emily is her given name) and her bio does indicate she has been a Cowboys cheerleader in the past. Her brother is (or was?) in the cast of "The Fantasticks" in New York according to the bio so clearly those "regular" folks who apply have an equal shot at getting on given the rather pedestrian background of these two...

Not my favorite team but not really any strong contenders this year for me. I suppose Toni and Dallas are the top of the bunch at the moment.
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
mcd1400de
Posts: 541
Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 11:01 am
Location: the Physics department

Re: TAR discussion thread

#20 Post by mcd1400de » Thu Nov 20, 2008 1:32 pm

tanstaafl2 wrote:
geoffil wrote:I read that Starr is a former Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader and her last name is Spangler.
Starr is her nickname (for obvious reasons given her last name, Emily is her given name) and her bio does indicate she has been a Cowboys cheerleader in the past. Her brother is (or was?) in the cast of "The Fantasticks" in New York....
He still is. I attended yesterday's matinee -- in fact, I'd already gotten the tickets before remembering Nick was in the cast, even though I'm a huge TAR fan! He and the rest of the show were quite good... very entertaining.

We stayed around afterwards and chatted with Nick for a good 15 minutes or so, and he was very gracious and friendly.... even if he wouldn't divulge any spoilers. ;-) (Btw, he said that Starr is her actual given middle name, rather than a nickname.)
Bazinga!

User avatar
tanstaafl2
Posts: 3494
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 4:45 pm
Location: I dunno. Let me check Google maps.

Re: TAR discussion thread

#21 Post by tanstaafl2 » Thu Nov 20, 2008 2:18 pm

mcd1400de wrote:
tanstaafl2 wrote:
geoffil wrote:I read that Starr is a former Dallas Cowboys Cheerleader and her last name is Spangler.
Starr is her nickname (for obvious reasons given her last name, Emily is her given name) and her bio does indicate she has been a Cowboys cheerleader in the past. Her brother is (or was?) in the cast of "The Fantasticks" in New York....
He still is. I attended yesterday's matinee -- in fact, I'd already gotten the tickets before remembering Nick was in the cast, even though I'm a huge TAR fan! He and the rest of the show were quite good... very entertaining.

We stayed around afterwards and chatted with Nick for a good 15 minutes or so, and he was very gracious and friendly.... even if he wouldn't divulge any spoilers. ;-) (Btw, he said that Starr is her actual given middle name, rather than a nickname.)
Well, a nickname I can kinda understand. But if that is her given name then at least one of her parents must be related to Bill Lear. Or at least they seem to have the same odd propensity for naming of children...
If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not bite you. This is the principal difference between a dog and a man.
~Mark Twain

Some people are like a Slinky. They are not really good for anything, but you still can't help but smile when you shove them down the stairs...
~tanstaafl2

Nullum Gratuitum Prandium
Ne Illegitimi Carborundum
Cumann na gClann Uí Thighearnaigh

User avatar
Winnamill
Posts: 144
Joined: Fri Jun 27, 2008 9:39 pm
Location: Sunnyvale, CA

Re: TAR discussion thread

#22 Post by Winnamill » Thu Nov 20, 2008 9:03 pm

The Spanglers run a funeral home in Mountain View, CA. It's about 2 miles from where I am right now -- at Starr's alma mater.

Post Reply