WWTBAM Bored

The infamous "What if" rant essentially calling anyone who doesn't support Obama a racist was submitted word for word as a letter to the editor today in the Arkansas Democrat Gazette.

The guy in Little Rock who submitted it could have at least credited Bob as the author.

IMO it looks like the Obama robots are being handled.

Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

They are not.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

Kinda like Michael and Janet Jackson.

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

They are not.

You've even seen us both at the same time.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

I'm the one who aspires to keep his posts focused on facts. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them propaganda. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:I'm the one who aspires to keep his posts focused on facts. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them propaganda. --Bob

Thanks for the afternoon humor pick-me-up!

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silvercamaro wrote:Which Bob?

No, I don't want to go back and read it, so there's no need to provide a link. I am thrilled that I managed to skip over something. My goal is to do more of that for the next few weeks.

I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

I'm the one who aspires to keep his posts focused on facts. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them propaganda. --Bob

Randomly posting 'facts' that only favor your point of view and ignoring 'facts' that conflict with it is spreading propaganda in my view. If you are using those 'facts' in an already existing debate, that is one thing, but to constantly post these things as 'news' without examining the opposing viewpoint is not fair and balanced.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:... posting 'facts' that only favor your point of view and ignoring 'facts' that conflict with it is spreading propaganda in my view.

Isn't this what W and friends did with the WMD intelligence?

gsabc wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:... posting 'facts' that only favor your point of view and ignoring 'facts' that conflict with it is spreading propaganda in my view.

Isn't this what W and friends did with the WMD intelligence?

Everyone does it, to a degree.

That's why I thanked Bob for the afternoon humor pick-me-up.

What makes it funnier than all get-out is Bob Numbers actually BELIEVES he's being unbiased.

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I get confused between BobJuch and Bob Numbers. They both post frequent random Obama propaganda. Maybe they are really the same person.

I'm the one who aspires to keep his posts focused on facts. Just because you don't like the facts doesn't make them propaganda. --Bob

Randomly posting 'facts' that only favor your point of view and ignoring 'facts' that conflict with it is spreading propaganda in my view. If you are using those 'facts' in an already existing debate, that is one thing, but to constantly post these things as 'news' without examining the opposing viewpoint is not fair and balanced.

Placing quotes around the word "facts" doesn't make them any less true. When I draw inferences or conclusions, I try to lay out enough of my reasoning to permit people to decide for themselves whether they agree or disagree.

I've easily been at least as "fair and balanced" as any news network that claims to be so. And I'm not a news network. --Bob

Bob78164 wrote:I've easily been at least as "fair and balanced" as any news network that claims to be so. And I'm not a news network. --Bob

And the hits keep right on coming!

That's damning yourself with faint praise!

Facts don't speak for themselves, Bob. You're a lawyer...you should know that.