Page 1 of 2
Blasts from the past
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:32 pm
by danielh41
Since I've been away so long, I was wondering when anyone last heard from the following:
jmcachran
Astronomer - my PAF
scruffyclaus - the carryover contestant on my show
Exeter5 - who immediately followed me into the hot seat; it seems like he missed his 2000 dollar question on the following show on something having to do with Mexican food.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:40 pm
by MarleysGh0st
I think it's been a long time since we've heard from any of them.
Beast will probaby be able to give you exact days, but I think he might have gone to bed, now.
Re: Blasts from the past
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:45 pm
by littlebeast13
danielh41 wrote:Since I've been away so long, I was wondering when anyone last heard from the following:
jmcachran
Astronomer - my PAF
scruffyclaus - the carryover contestant on my show
Exeter5 - who immediately followed me into the hot seat; it seems like he missed his 2000 dollar question on the following show on something having to do with Mexican food.
jmcachran has not been seen around here since early 2001.
Astro last posted on 2/23/02, but that was his first and only post since 2/23/01 (I brought him out of the woodwork, so it wasn't a coincidence).
scruffy hasn't been seen since shortly after that 3/11/01 show (Which not only contained 3 BB's in the Hot Seat, but 5 BB shoutouts in the questions, and a question... I believe one of yours you used a lifeline on, which I had just asked in the February 2001 QoD about the weasel family).
Exeter571 (Jade Smith) was lost after the original ABC Bored tumbled at the end of November 2001. He never followed us to the hiding places during the Morlock invasion, so it was no surprise he never followed us to the Love Boat...
lb13
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:50 pm
by MarleysGh0st
Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!
Make that one exact date and one "shortly after" an exact date. Even worse.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:51 pm
by littlebeast13
MarleysGh0st wrote:Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!

I only provided one exact date...
lb13
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:52 pm
by minimetoo26
MarleysGh0st wrote:Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!

All this MM creation is keeping him away from the notebooks! That might just be from memory...
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:53 pm
by MarleysGh0st
I still don't understand why an editing footnote shows up for me sometimes and not others? Is there a window during which you can sneak in a quick fix without it being noted?
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:53 pm
by peacock2121
littlebeast13 wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote:Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!

I only provided one exact date...
lb13
look at that - beast pissing not so politely.
How fun!
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:55 pm
by littlebeast13
MarleysGh0st wrote:Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!
Make that one exact date and one "shortly after" an exact date. Even worse.
If it wasn't apparent, Exeter was with us (And, I believe, playing the November 2001 QoD) right up until the Bored's D-Day on 11/30/01, so his last post was likely that day or a day or two before it. That's a lot better than I can do for scruffy or jmcachran...
lb13
Re: Blasts from the past
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:56 pm
by danielh41
littlebeast13 wrote:scruffy hasn't been seen since shortly after that 3/11/01 show (Which not only contained 3 BB's in the Hot Seat, but 5 BB shoutouts in the questions, and a question... I believe one of yours you used a lifeline on, which I had just asked in the February 2001 QoD about the weasel family).
Exeter571 (Jade Smith) was lost after the original ABC Bored tumbled at the end of November 2001. He never followed us to the hiding places during the Morlock invasion, so it was no surprise he never followed us to the Love Boat...
lb13
I remember using my ask the audience lifeline on that weasel family question, only because I wasn't 100% sure of my answer, but I don't remember what the question was. I'll have to watch my mpeg file again...
Jade and I exchanged a couple of e-mails in March of 2001, but I haven't heard from him since then. I still have the e-mails, and I'll send you the address I have for him in a PM so you can invite him to this board. Of course, after 6 and a half years, that e-mail address may not be any good any more...
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:57 pm
by silvercamaro
jmcachran never recovered from sleeping through his long-awaited (and only) Round Two.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:57 pm
by littlebeast13
peacock2121 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote:Only two out of four exact dates, beast?
How disappointing!

I only provided one exact date...
lb13
look at that - beast pissing not so politely.
How fun!
That's actually pretty common for me. I think the extra periods I tend to add on at the end give me an impatient, pissed off kind of mood.
Speaking of pissed off, I'll bet John Ashcroft's getting his panties in a bunch again...
lb13
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:01 pm
by Rexer25
MarleysGh0st wrote:I still don't understand why an editing footnote shows up for me sometimes and not others? Is there a window during which you can sneak in a quick fix without it being noted?
That's about right, but it's explained in more detail in the FAQ.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:04 pm
by Otto Censor
littlebeast13 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:littlebeast13 wrote:
I only provided one exact date...
lb13
look at that - beast pissing not so politely.
How fun!
That's actually pretty common for me. I think the extra periods I tend to add on at the end give me an impatient, pissed off kind of mood.
Speaking of pissed off, I'll bet John Ashcroft's getting his panties in a bunch again...
lb13
Keep those panties covered up!
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:06 pm
by peacock2121
Pretty panties are meant to be seen.
Just like pretty bra straps.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:08 pm
by MarleysGh0st
littlebeast13 wrote:That's actually pretty common for me. I think the extra periods I tend to add on at the end give me an impatient, pissed off kind of mood.
You think so?
I frequently use the ellipsis at the end of a sentence, which I know is grammatical incorrect, but I think it adds an inflectional emphasis, indicating that the conversation just trails off instead of coming to an abrupt, full stop.
Common usage can change the rules, over time. This one would be much better than what we'll end up with from the text messaging world.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:09 pm
by Otto Censor
peacock2121 wrote:Pretty panties are meant to be seen.
Just like pretty bra straps.
*swoon**faint**thud*
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:11 pm
by peacock2121
Otto Censor wrote:peacock2121 wrote:Pretty panties are meant to be seen.
Just like pretty bra straps.
*swoon**faint**thud*
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:14 pm
by Adolesent Humor Guy
peacock2121 wrote:Pretty panties are meant to be seen.
Just like pretty bra straps.
Panties...they're not the best thing in the world, but they're right next to it.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:14 pm
by minimetoo26
peacock2121 wrote:Otto Censor wrote:peacock2121 wrote:Pretty panties are meant to be seen.
Just like pretty bra straps.
*swoon**faint**thud*
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:15 pm
by peacock2121
minimetoo26 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:Otto Censor wrote:
*swoon**faint**thud*
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Give him a second.
I'm sure he will come.
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:18 pm
by minimetoo26
peacock2121 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Give him a second.
I'm sure he will come.
Okay, that could get skippy here...
I think that MM was beast's who BETTER BE IN BED!!!!! And not with a four...I better quit while I'm ahead...

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:43 pm
by PRIAPISM
peacock2121 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Give him a second.
I'm sure he will come.
My little brother couldn't make it, but I'm here.

Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:44 pm
by ladysoleil
peacock2121 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:peacock2121 wrote:
panties got a wee bit too bunched, I guess.
gotta keep the circulation going to the boys or well....... you know.
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Give him a second.
I'm sure he will come.
Wouldn't that sort of cancel out the need for four hours though?
Posted: Fri Nov 09, 2007 2:48 pm
by peacock2121
PRIAPISM wrote:peacock2121 wrote:minimetoo26 wrote:
I'm just glad Four_Hour_Stiffy hasn't registered yet...
Give him a second.
I'm sure he will come.
My little brother couldn't make it, but I'm here.

OH MY GOD!!!!!