Meryl Streep

[Jeemie]

I'm no fan of Obama's and I disagree with a lot of the things he has done, but, as President, he has always conducted himself in public with grace and dignity and in accordance with the finest traditions of this office.

Um...no.

Obama has used his office to be quite petty, especially against leaders he doesn't like, for example Netanyahu, who he got into a silly tit for tat snubbing war over.

Left Bibi in a meeting room after a tense meeting to go have supper with his family.

Had the SecState call him after he won re-election.

Meddled in HIS re-election process.

That's just one example of Obama's pettiness when things didn't go his way. I chose it because I'm no fan of Netanyahu, but that's a shameful way to treat a foreign leader...certainly not "graceful and dignified".

[flockofseagulls104]

"...you always go with what comes out of his mouth instead of what's in (Trump's) heart." some professional whore.

There you go

[flockofseagulls104]

That applies to you as well. As far as I know, there's no record of him calling someone he doesn't know a whore. Oh, a professional whore. That's different. He's probably done something like that. So you are on the same level as Trump. Insulting a woman, even worse.
Imagine if you were running for President. Your post on the Bored would be fodder for the media for weeks. You wrote it, it must be in your heart, you evil person. Let's riot....

Can you point out a post of mine where I insulted Kellyanne Conway or called her a whore?

It wasn't you, it was ne1. Sorry.

[Jeemie]

That applies to you as well. As far as I know, there's no record of him calling someone he doesn't know a whore. Oh, a professional whore. That's different. He's probably done something like that. So you are on the same level as Trump. Insulting a woman, even worse.
Imagine if you were running for President. Your post on the Bored would be fodder for the media for weeks. You wrote it, it must be in your heart, you evil person. Let's riot....

Can you point out a post of mine where I insulted Kellyanne Conway or called her a whore?

It wasn't you, it was ne1. Sorry.

Thanks for being honest.

Now be honest and admit your criterion for when Meryl Streep is allowed to speak her mind politically is ridiculous, and you just don't want her speaking her mind because you disagree with what she has to say.

[flockofseagulls104]

Can you point out a post of mine where I insulted Kellyanne Conway or called her a whore?

It wasn't you, it was ne1. Sorry.

Thanks for being honest.

Now be honest and admit your criterion for when Meryl Streep is allowed to speak her mind politically is ridiculous, and you just don't want her speaking her mind because you disagree with what she has to say.

I am sorry about confusing you with someone else. But Ms Streep is a coward, is rude and uninformed. She used her celebrity to promote her own biased views, in a forum where it was totally out of place and where no one could challenge her. If she wants to spout her political beliefs, she should do it in a place where it is appropriate. In a political forum.
Yes, she has a constitutional right to do what she did. But I have the right to object to it. And many people, including me, are fed up with celebrities that do this. ON BOTH SIDES.

[Bob78164]

It wasn't you, it was ne1. Sorry.

Thanks for being honest.

Now be honest and admit your criterion for when Meryl Streep is allowed to speak her mind politically is ridiculous, and you just don't want her speaking her mind because you disagree with what she has to say.

I am sorry about confusing you with someone else. But Ms Streep is a coward, is rude and uninformed. She used her celebrity to promote her own biased views, in a forum where it was totally out of place and where no one could challenge her. If she wants to spout her political beliefs, she should do it in a place where it is appropriate. In a political forum.
Yes, she has a constitutional right to do what she did. But I have the right to object to it. And many people, including me, are fed up with celebrities that do this. ON BOTH SIDES.

People like Trump who mock the disabled don't get to complain about others being rude. --Bob

[Jeemie]

But Ms Streep is a coward, is rude and uninformed. She used her celebrity to promote her own biased views, in a forum where it was totally out of place and where no one could challenge her. If she wants to spout her political beliefs, she should do it in a place where it is appropriate. In a political forum.
Yes, she has a constitutional right to do what she did. But I have the right to object to it. And many people, including me, are fed up with celebrities that do this. ON BOTH SIDES.

Almost everyone gives their political opinions in fora where their opinions go unchallenged.

Hardly any political speech is given in a debate hall.

Clint Eastwood's empty chair speech was given in a political forum, but not one where he was going to be challenged.

Is he a coward?

Think of the conservative celebrities like Chuck Norris and Ted Nugent that go on conservative talk media to spout off their political views...you won't find them going on Rachel Maddow's shows. Are they cowards?

Conservative media celebrities themselves never venture out of their safe conservative venues. You will never find Sean Hannity in a political discussion forum where he is not in control of the rules of engagement for that forum. Is Sean Hannity a coward?

I agree with you that it was an awards show and was up there because she was being honored for her acting, and for that reason the speech was out of place.

But to say she can only give speeches where she can be challenged, else she's a coward is a standard that I never see you holding anyone with whom you agree to.

[Bob78164]

I agree with you that it was an awards show and was up there because she was being honored for her acting, and for that reason the speech was out of place.

Seems to me that's up to the sponsoring organization. They don't seem to have a problem with her speech. --Bob

[silverscreenselect]

I agree with you that it was an awards show and was up there because she was being honored for her acting, and for that reason the speech was out of place.

Seems to me that's up to the sponsoring organization. They don't seem to have a problem with her speech. --Bob

Just guess what they'll say about Trump at the Oscars.

[flockofseagulls104]

But Ms Streep is a coward, is rude and uninformed. She used her celebrity to promote her own biased views, in a forum where it was totally out of place and where no one could challenge her. If she wants to spout her political beliefs, she should do it in a place where it is appropriate. In a political forum.
Yes, she has a constitutional right to do what she did. But I have the right to object to it. And many people, including me, are fed up with celebrities that do this. ON BOTH SIDES.

Almost everyone gives their political opinions in fora where their opinions go unchallenged.

Hardly any political speech is given in a debate hall.

Clint Eastwood's empty chair speech was given in a political forum, but not one where he was going to be challenged.

Is he a coward?

Think of the conservative celebrities like Chuck Norris and Ted Nugent that go on conservative talk media to spout off their political views...you won't find them going on Rachel Maddow's shows. Are they cowards?

Conservative media celebrities themselves never venture out of their safe conservative venues. You will never find Sean Hannity in a political discussion forum where he is not in control of the rules of engagement for that forum. Is Sean Hannity a coward?

I agree with you that it was an awards show and was up there because she was being honored for her acting, and for that reason the speech was out of place.

But to say she can only give speeches where she can be challenged, else she's a coward is a standard that I never see you holding anyone with whom you agree to.

All the venues you refer to are political venues. Whether they are challenged or not, they are appropriate. The Golden Globes and the Academy Awards are not political venues. People don't go there to be lectured to. Except those that like watching car races for the crashes.
I never said she CAN ONLY GIVE speeches where I want her to. That is making a big leap. I said "SHOULD". Can you not understand the difference? What, do you think I would make some kind of law banning actors from giving political speeches if I had the power? No, banning things they don't like is what democrats do. (And republicans that act like democrats [So I don't get a list of examples]). You know what I meant. It is frustrating to quibble over the words I choose to express it to try and poke holes.
Try to understand what someone is trying to say, rather than fixating on words, please.

[flockofseagulls104]

I agree with you that it was an awards show and was up there because she was being honored for her acting, and for that reason the speech was out of place.

Seems to me that's up to the sponsoring organization. They don't seem to have a problem with her speech. --Bob

Just guess what they'll say about Trump at the Oscars.

Can't wait.

[flockofseagulls104]

Thanks for being honest.

Now be honest and admit your criterion for when Meryl Streep is allowed to speak her mind politically is ridiculous, and you just don't want her speaking her mind because you disagree with what she has to say.

I am sorry about confusing you with someone else. But Ms Streep is a coward, is rude and uninformed. She used her celebrity to promote her own biased views, in a forum where it was totally out of place and where no one could challenge her. If she wants to spout her political beliefs, she should do it in a place where it is appropriate. In a political forum.
Yes, she has a constitutional right to do what she did. But I have the right to object to it. And many people, including me, are fed up with celebrities that do this. ON BOTH SIDES.

People like Trump who mock the disabled don't get to complain about others being rude. --Bob

Bob,
Let me explain something to you....


TRUMP DID NOT MOCK THE DISABLED.

[Bob78164]

Bob,
Let me explain something to you....


TRUMP DID NOT MOCK THE DISABLED.

The video says otherwise.



--Bob

[BackInTex]

Bob,
Let me explain something to you....


TRUMP DID NOT MOCK THE DISABLED.

The video says otherwise.

--Bob

For an attorney, words should matter. Apparently they don't.

He did not mock the disabled.

He DID mock a disabled reporter. But he did not mock the reporter for his disability. He mocked him because he is a moron. Just because a reporter has a disability does not mean he is immune from criticism, or mocking, as other reporters, or people, may be subject to. That would be discriminatory.

[flockofseagulls104]

Bob,
Let me explain something to you....


TRUMP DID NOT MOCK THE DISABLED.

The video says otherwise.



--Bob

Wow, behaving like BJ now.

[silverscreenselect]

He mocked him because he is a moron. Just because a reporter has a disability does not mean he is immune from criticism, or mocking, as other reporters, or people, may be subject to. That would be discriminatory.

So, it's now okay to talk like Amos and Andy and refer to birthin babies and eatin watermelon to mock people for being morons (as long as you mock white people as well) because you're not mocking them for being black.

Got it.

[Bob78164]

Bob,
Let me explain something to you....


TRUMP DID NOT MOCK THE DISABLED.

The video says otherwise.

--Bob

For an attorney, words should matter. Apparently they don't.

He did not mock the disabled.

He DID mock a disabled reporter. But he did not mock the reporter for his disability. He mocked him because he is a moron. Just because a reporter has a disability does not mean he is immune from criticism, or mocking, as other reporters, or people, may be subject to. That would be discriminatory.

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.



--Bob

[BackInTex]

So, it's now okay to talk like Amos and Andy ...

Got it.

I guess so.

[BackInTex]

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.



--Bob

Those are the mannerisms used to mock anyone who is wishy-washy and confused.

[silverscreenselect]

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.

Trump did the exact same thing we used to do in elementary school when we acted out "spazz jokes." We outgrew that type of humor by the time we got to high school. Donald Trump never has.

[flockofseagulls104]

The video says otherwise.

--Bob

For an attorney, words should matter. Apparently they don't.

He did not mock the disabled.

He DID mock a disabled reporter. But he did not mock the reporter for his disability. He mocked him because he is a moron. Just because a reporter has a disability does not mean he is immune from criticism, or mocking, as other reporters, or people, may be subject to. That would be discriminatory.

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.


--Bob

LOL. Fake News, Bob

[flockofseagulls104]

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.

Trump did the exact same thing we used to do in elementary school when we acted out "spazz jokes." We outgrew that type of humor by the time we got to high school. Donald Trump never has.

YOU ACTED OUT SPAZZ JOKES????!!!!!!

[flockofseagulls104]

The video says otherwise.

--Bob

For an attorney, words should matter. Apparently they don't.

He did not mock the disabled.

He DID mock a disabled reporter. But he did not mock the reporter for his disability. He mocked him because he is a moron. Just because a reporter has a disability does not mean he is immune from criticism, or mocking, as other reporters, or people, may be subject to. That would be discriminatory.

He didn't mock him by using his words. He mocked him by imitating his physical mannerisms. Don't believe me? See for yourself.



--Bob

Show me ONE video of Serge Kovaleski making any kind of involuntary moves that in any way resembles what your favorite video shows. Just one.

hashtag FAKE NEWS

[silverscreenselect]

Show me ONE video of Serge Kovaleski making any kind of involuntary moves that in any way resembles what your favorite video shows. Just one.

hashtag FAKE NEWS

It doesn't matter whether or not Serge made those types of involuntary moves.

Just like using the N-word to refer to a dark skinned person from India is a slur.

Just like referring to Barack Obama in Amos and Andy speak is a slur, even though you'd be very hard pressed to find an example of Obama himself speaking that way.

Just like Rush Limbaugh doing his Michael J. Fox impression was a slur.

What matters is that Trump used an offensive slur for a disabled person in public on multiple occasions and that you and he and many of his other supporters don't seem to think there's anything wrong with that.

[flockofseagulls104]

Show me ONE video of Serge Kovaleski making any kind of involuntary moves that in any way resembles what your favorite video shows. Just one.

hashtag FAKE NEWS

It doesn't matter whether or not Serge made those types of involuntary moves.

Just like using the N-word to refer to a dark skinned person from India is a slur.

Just like referring to Barack Obama in Amos and Andy speak is a slur, even though you'd be very hard pressed to find an example of Obama himself speaking that way.

Just like Rush Limbaugh doing his Michael J. Fox impression was a slur.

What matters is that Trump used an offensive slur for a disabled person in public on multiple occasions and that you and he and many of his other supporters don't seem to think there's anything wrong with that.

I'm not going to get you to stop sucking on your Trump binky, so I'll use Bob's idea. He's a high class lawyer, so he is an expert in the art of persuasion.
Besides, you are scum for acting out spazz jokes. You offend me. Let's go riot.....


#FAKE NEWS