Page 2 of 2
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 4:21 pm
by Estonut
Bob78164 wrote:BackInTex wrote:Bob78164 wrote:Are you referring to the faked video of Speaker Pelosi that was altered to make it seem as though she was slurring her words?
It was NOT faked. The video is real unaltered clips in a montage. Yes it is a montage to show the Speaker is slurring her words, confused, unable to complete a full sentence, and who's hands are functioning 1 finger less than her mouth.
It is no worse than what has been done to Bob's and my president Donald J Trump.
And no, I don't approve of either.
I'm not talking about the Fox News fakery, which was edited to make Speaker Pelosi falsely appear incoherent. (This, incidentally, is excellent evidence that Fox News is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Republican Party, which is exactly what it was designed to be.) There was another one circulated where the sound was actually altered.
The video must not be convincing since you failed to provide a link, as you would demand from anyone else.
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 4:34 pm
by Beebs52
Estonut wrote:Bob78164 wrote:BackInTex wrote:It was NOT faked. The video is real unaltered clips in a montage. Yes it is a montage to show the Speaker is slurring her words, confused, unable to complete a full sentence, and who's hands are functioning 1 finger less than her mouth.
It is no worse than what has been done to Bob's and my president Donald J Trump.
And no, I don't approve of either.
I'm not talking about the Fox News fakery, which was edited to make Speaker Pelosi falsely appear incoherent. (This, incidentally, is excellent evidence that Fox News is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Republican Party, which is exactly what it was designed to be.) There was another one circulated where the sound was actually altered.
The video must not be convincing since you failed to provide a link, as you would demand from anyone else.
Bob78164 wrote:
Beebs52 wrote:
Heart, bless it. Meds, adjust.
Are you referring to the faked video of Speaker Pelosi that was altered to make it seem as though she was slurring her words? --Bob
No. I was referring to her intervention comment. Care to engage?
Nah. She just wanted to get under Donny's skin. As usual, it worked. She's good
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 4:50 pm
by Bob78164
Estonut wrote:Bob78164 wrote:BackInTex wrote:It was NOT faked. The video is real unaltered clips in a montage. Yes it is a montage to show the Speaker is slurring her words, confused, unable to complete a full sentence, and who's hands are functioning 1 finger less than her mouth.
It is no worse than what has been done to Bob's and my president Donald J Trump.
And no, I don't approve of either.
I'm not talking about the Fox News fakery, which was edited to make Speaker Pelosi falsely appear incoherent. (This, incidentally, is excellent evidence that Fox News is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Republican Party, which is exactly what it was designed to be.) There was another one circulated where the sound was actually altered.
The video must not be convincing since you failed to provide a link, as you would demand from anyone else.
Not hard to find descriptions. The
Washington Post covered the story. I can't get at it from this computer -- it's behind a paywall and I've used this computer to read too many stories there this month already.
And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos. --Bob
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 5:52 pm
by Beebs52
Bob78164 wrote:Estonut wrote:Bob78164 wrote:I'm not talking about the Fox News fakery, which was edited to make Speaker Pelosi falsely appear incoherent. (This, incidentally, is excellent evidence that Fox News is nothing more than the propaganda arm of the Republican Party, which is exactly what it was designed to be.) There was another one circulated where the sound was actually altered.
The video must not be convincing since you failed to provide a link, as you would demand from anyone else.
Not hard to find descriptions. The
Washington Post covered the story. I can't get at it from this computer -- it's behind a paywall and I've used this computer to read too many stories there this month already.
And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos. --Bob
The whole point of this thread WASN'T a video. Bob.
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 5:54 pm
by Bob78164
Beebs52 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:Estonut wrote:The video must not be convincing since you failed to provide a link, as you would demand from anyone else.
Not hard to find descriptions. The
Washington Post covered the story. I can't get at it from this computer -- it's behind a paywall and I've used this computer to read too many stories there this month already.
And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos. --Bob
The whole point of this thread WASN'T a video. Bob.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that a thread on this Bored might get hijacked. --Bob
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 6:01 pm
by Beebs52
Bob78164 wrote:Beebs52 wrote:Bob78164 wrote:Not hard to find descriptions. The Washington Post covered the story. I can't get at it from this computer -- it's behind a paywall and I've used this computer to read too many stories there this month already.
And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos. --Bob
The whole point of this thread WASN'T a video. Bob.
I'm shocked, shocked I tell you, that a thread on this Bored might get hijacked. --Bob
Be unique.
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 7:25 pm
by Bob78164
Here's more on the Fox News fakery, including a link to the entire 21-minute video from which it was created. --Bob
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:24 am
by Estonut
Bob78164 wrote:And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos.
You brought it up, you provide the link. "Your audience" does not blindly believe everything (anything?) you post. Some people actually like to watch the source and decide for themselves, not just claim to do so.
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 2:02 am
by Bob78164
Estonut wrote:Bob78164 wrote:And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos.
You brought it up, you provide the link. "Your audience" does not blindly believe everything (anything?) you post. Some people actually like to watch the source and decide for themselves, not just claim to do so.
Here's Rudy Guiliani incoherently apologizing for retweeting it. If you choose to disbelieve that it existed, you're welcome to do so. I won't propagate it. --Bob
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 10:01 am
by flockofseagulls104
As far as i can tell, fox news had nothing to do with the production of said video, and it is even in dispute whether they even aired the altered version. But if the batphone says so, it must be your truth.
I like this new meme, "my truth". Convenient way to spread lies.
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Sat May 25, 2019 12:44 pm
by Bob Juch
Estonut wrote:Bob78164 wrote:And as a matter of policy I decline to give further exposure to deliberately faked videos.
You brought it up, you provide the link. "Your audience" does not blindly believe everything (anything?) you post. Some people actually like to watch the source and decide for themselves, not just claim to do so.
https://www.cbsnews.com/video/doctored- ... ACJABphpbI
Re: Pelosi
Posted: Thu Jun 13, 2019 10:52 am
by Vandal
Pelosi on Trump saying he would listen to information on political opponent:
Yesterday the president gave us once again evidence that he does not know right from wrong. It is a very sad thing.