WWTBAM Bored

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

So far, Trump is accused of offenses like the ones that got Clinton impeached.

So far, trump has been accused of everything, so that's not a reach. Where's the blue dress?

You mean eyewitness testimony and signed checks demonstrating criminal conduct? Aren't you watching Cohen's testimony? --Bob

Based on the evidence presented every one of your firm’s clients should also be broughtt up on charges I guess. I didn’t know writing a check to your attorney meant you are paying hush money. My bad.

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

flockofseagulls104 wrote:
So far, trump has been accused of everything, so that's not a reach. Where's the blue dress?

You mean eyewitness testimony and signed checks demonstrating criminal conduct? Aren't you watching Cohen's testimony? --Bob

Based on the evidence presented every one of your firm’s clients should also be broughtt up on charges I guess. I didn’t know writing a check to your attorney meant you are paying hush money. My bad.

I've never written a check in an effort to make a concealed campaign contribution, so none of my clients have ever had occasion to break the law by reimbursing me for them. --Bob

flockofseagulls104 wrote:

silverscreenselect wrote:

Bob78164 wrote: You mean eyewitness testimony and signed checks demonstrating criminal conduct? Aren't you watching Cohen's testimony? --Bob

Of course not. Flock's already been told what to think.

Darn. Feb 2nd again. I got you babe...

Cue the batphone reference. Flock's got no answer to what went on today.

Bob78164 wrote:

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:You mean eyewitness testimony and signed checks demonstrating criminal conduct? Aren't you watching Cohen's testimony? --Bob

Based on the evidence presented every one of your firm’s clients should also be broughtt up on charges I guess. I didn’t know writing a check to your attorney meant you are paying hush money. My bad.

I've never written a check in an effort to make a concealed campaign contribution, so none of my clients have ever had occasion to break the law by reimbursing me for them. --Bob

Of course you’d say that. You haven’t been granted any immunity.

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

BackInTex wrote:
Based on the evidence presented every one of your firm’s clients should also be broughtt up on charges I guess. I didn’t know writing a check to your attorney meant you are paying hush money. My bad.

I've never written a check in an effort to make a concealed campaign contribution, so none of my clients have ever had occasion to break the law by reimbursing me for them. --Bob

Of course you’d say that. You haven’t been granted any immunity.

He hasn't needed any either.

BackInTex wrote:

Bob78164 wrote:

BackInTex wrote:
Based on the evidence presented every one of your firm’s clients should also be broughtt up on charges I guess. I didn’t know writing a check to your attorney meant you are paying hush money. My bad.

I've never written a check in an effort to make a concealed campaign contribution, so none of my clients have ever had occasion to break the law by reimbursing me for them. --Bob

Of course you’d say that. You haven’t been granted any immunity.

I don't know what you're talking about. I get my flu shots every year. --Bob

The House Ethics Committee (which is bipartisan with equal numbers of Republicans and Democrats) has opened an investigation into Gaetz's tweet. --Bob