frogman042 wrote:tanstaafl2 wrote:BBTranscriptTeam wrote: Tournament of Ten Leader Board
1. Will Capp $25,000 - 2:39
2. Karen Geddeis $16,000 - 1:23
3. Melissa Brown $16,000 - 1:34
4. Kazia MacLeod $1,000 - 0:42
5. Matt Sittel $1,000 - 0:53
6. Brian Peterkin $1,000 - 1:04
-- Commercial Break --
I presume these are all from the "Lucky Nine" invited to play at the end of PTBAM? They have been damned impressive so far.
Too bad they didn't get their shot during primetime. That would have really done wonders for the ratings...
I guess this means that those PTBAM contestants just can't handle the tougher Syndi version - regardless of the method of getting on
(Note: I realize that I am responding to myself - but it is not really a response - just an add-on)
I just want to clarify that I am in no way trying to disparage or insult any of these folks. I know how hard it is and the final $ outcome is not a barometer on the intelligence or any other metric on any of these folks. My point, if it wasn't clear, was to poke fun at the notion that there is some sort of real difference between the quality of players between the two versions of the shows (PT and Syndi) with usually some of those who like to raise it somehow think that the Syndi folks just aren't as worthy as those from the PT days - usually pointing out the differences in the amount won between the two. Given this is really the first and only real (if only partial since only a % were phone game qualifiers) cross-over group and given the moans about the overall performance to date, I couldn't resist.
Actually, I think the two sets probably have the same distribution in terms of knowledge, ability, risk taking aversion, etc. With the exception of ability (which is what the test tries to screen for), I'm convinced that TPTB do not use these other attributes as screening factors. But, of course, I don't have any real inside knowledge.