Because ToobaDave doesn't let the google bots climb over our threads. Or something like that.earendel wrote:On the J! board?? Why don't any of the appearances here show up on Google?Rexer25 wrote:BTW, if you google ontopicosity, it has 2 mentions: one on the J! board, and another on some British board.
A new word
-
Rexer25
- It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
- Posts: 2899
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
- Location: Just this side of nowhere
Re: A new word
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!
That'll be $10, please.
That'll be $10, please.
-
earendel
- Posts: 13883
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 5:25 am
- Location: mired in the bureaucracy
Re: A new word
OK, but evidently Yahoo bots are OK? I've seen "yahoo[bot]" on the list of those on the Bored.Rexer25 wrote:Because ToobaDave doesn't let the google bots climb over our threads. Or something like that.earendel wrote:On the J! board?? Why don't any of the appearances here show up on Google?Rexer25 wrote:BTW, if you google ontopicosity, it has 2 mentions: one on the J! board, and another on some British board.
"Elen sila lumenn omentielvo...A star shines on the hour of our meeting."
-
Beebs52
- Queen of Wack
- Posts: 16560
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
- Location: Location.Location.Location
Re: A new word
I'll start work on a new new word. One must begin somewhere. We need to do a bored list, again, of made up words. Didn't we do that some time ago?
Well, then
-
Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
Re: A new word
Would that make you a lingventor or a linguineer?Beebs52 wrote:I'll start work on a new new word.
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx
Groucho Marx