Re: Official Donny, Drumpf, Trump Thread
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2019 9:37 am
Tweeted:
3.1 GDP FOR THE YEAR, BEST NUMBER IN 14 YEARS!
3.1 GDP FOR THE YEAR, BEST NUMBER IN 14 YEARS!
The Mainstream Media is under fire and being scorned all over the World as being corrupt and FAKE. For two years they pushed the Russian Collusion Delusion when they always knew there was No Collusion. They truly are the Enemy of the People and the Real Opposition Party!
The "all over the world" apparently doesn't extend past the Moscow city limits.Vandal wrote:Tweete3d:
The Mainstream Media is under fire and being scorned all over the World as being corrupt and FAKE. For two years they pushed the Russian Collusion Delusion when they always knew there was No Collusion. They truly are the Enemy of the People and the Real Opposition Party!
Base on what, your hopes? Pathetic.silverscreenselect wrote:The "all over the world" apparently doesn't extend past the Moscow city limits.Vandal wrote:Tweete3d:
The Mainstream Media is under fire and being scorned all over the World as being corrupt and FAKE. For two years they pushed the Russian Collusion Delusion when they always knew there was No Collusion. They truly are the Enemy of the People and the Real Opposition Party!
The Fake News Media has lost tremendous credibility with its corrupt coverage of the illegal Democrat Witch Hunt of your all time favorite duly elected President, me! T.V. ratings of CNN & MSNBC tanked last night after seeing the Mueller Report statement. @FoxNews up BIG!
Vandal wrote:Tweeted:
The Fake News Media has lost tremendous credibility with its corrupt coverage of the illegal Democrat Witch Hunt of your all time favorite duly elected President, me! T.V. ratings of CNN & MSNBC tanked last night after seeing the Mueller Report statement. @FoxNews up BIG!
Yeah, but we coulda had a 900 yr old reincarnated harpy. So there's that.littlebeast13 wrote:Vandal wrote:Tweeted:
The Fake News Media has lost tremendous credibility with its corrupt coverage of the illegal Democrat Witch Hunt of your all time favorite duly elected President, me! T.V. ratings of CNN & MSNBC tanked last night after seeing the Mueller Report statement. @FoxNews up BIG!
You don't need a report on whatever the hell they were investigating to tell you've elected a four year old child to be your President...
lb13
He’s getting stuff done and MAGA!Beebs52 wrote:Yeah, but we coulda had a 900 yr old reincarnated harpy. So there's that.littlebeast13 wrote:Vandal wrote:Tweeted:
You don't need a report on whatever the hell they were investigating to tell you've elected a four year old child to be your President...
lb13
You gotta give 'em a break, BiT - they were promised Hillary/impeachment/collusion/ and just keep getting disappointed! Life is hard.BackInTex wrote:He’s getting stuff done and MAGA!Beebs52 wrote:Yeah, but we coulda had a 900 yr old reincarnated harpy. So there's that.littlebeast13 wrote:
You don't need a report on whatever the hell they were investigating to tell you've elected a four year old child to be your President...
lb13
It's a good thing to have when your congress is full of 2 year olds.littlebeast13 wrote:Vandal wrote:Tweeted:
The Fake News Media has lost tremendous credibility with its corrupt coverage of the illegal Democrat Witch Hunt of your all time favorite duly elected President, me! T.V. ratings of CNN & MSNBC tanked last night after seeing the Mueller Report statement. @FoxNews up BIG!
You don't need a report on whatever the hell they were investigating to tell you've elected a four year old child to be your President...
lb13
Wow, ratings for “Morning Joe,” which were really bad in the first place, just “tanked” with the release of the Mueller Report. Likewise, other shows on MSNBC and CNN have gone down by as much as 50%. Just shows, Fake News never wins!
WowFBI & DOJ to review the outrageous Jussie Smollett case in Chicago. It is an embarrassment to our Nation!
a1mamacat wrote:WowFBI & DOJ to review the outrageous Jussie Smollett case in Chicago. It is an embarrassment to our Nation!
just
Wow
Also interesting:tlynn78 wrote:a1mamacat wrote:WowFBI & DOJ to review the outrageous Jussie Smollett case in Chicago. It is an embarrassment to our Nation!
just
Wow
I know! It's going to be interesting to see who the "high-level political friend" is.
Donald J. Trump wrote:The Democrats are allowing a ridiculous asylum system and major loopholes to remain as a mainstay of our immigration system. Mexico is likewise doing NOTHING, a very bad combination for our Country. Homeland Security is being sooo very nice, but not for long!
Um, they DO kill birds. Not just your average sparrows but large and endangered ones, like California Condors. And eagles, and buzzards.jarnon wrote: “If you have a windmill anywhere near your house, congratulations, your house just went down 75% in value. And they say the noise causes cancer. (Whirr! Whirr!) And of course it’s like a graveyard for birds.” (He’s hated windmills for decades. He thinks they’re bad for the environment because they kill birds.)
No one in their right mind would want their views spoiled by these ugly ass devices.At Altamont Pass, where nearly 7,000 prop wind turbines choke the landscape, over 1,000 birds of prey die each year. One of the most commonly killed species at the Altamont pass wind farm is the turkey vulture. This is well documented.
U.S. Sen. Edward Kennedy's primary residence is in Hyannisport, Mass., on the Kennedy family compound. It's one of the closest landfalls -- about 6 miles -- from the proposed site of the 440-feet turbines, which would be visible from his house as well as other surrounding coastlines.
Since 2001, there have been various legislative attempts to quash the project in Washington, many of which could be tied one way or another to the Democratic Bay State senator.
As the battle moves into its final permitting phase, Gordon said he holds on to hope that Kennedy -- typically known as an environmental advocate -- will alter his position.
Wind farms are hardly the bird slayers they're made out to be—here's whyBackInTex wrote:Um, they DO kill birds. Not just your average sparrows but large and endangered ones, like California Condors. And eagles, and buzzards.
Apparently, according to BiT, the vast majority of this nation's scientists are pricks because they keep pointing out things that Trump is completely wrong about.Newsweek wrote: There is no evidence that the noise of a wind turbine causes cancer. Anti-wind power groups have incorrectly claimed that the low-frequency noise — known as infrasound — given off by turbines can cause health problems including nausea, sleep loss and anxiety, among many other symptoms, The Atlantic explained.
No research has ever shown harm from such low frequencies, and no cancer of any kind has a proven link to high levels of noise. Chemicals and particulates released in the extraction, storage, transportation and burning of coal and other fossil fuels, in comparison, have been proven to cause higher rates of cancer.
I agree with this.jarnon wrote:And solar panels, batteries in electric cars, etc. contain metals that are as dangerous to mine as coal and toxic when they’re disposed of. As long as humans use energy, there will be tradeoffs. Conservation (fuel efficient vehicles and appliances, insulation and LED bulbs) is probably the least damaging.
What is not given in the summary (and I'm not paying $19.95 for the full report) is how they determine the number and type of birds killed by each form of generation. I'd be interested to see for gas fired generation how and what kinds of birds are being killed. Also I'd like the separation of coal from natural gas, natural gas being the cleanest fossil fuel, most economic and available energy resource we have in the USA.silverscreenselect wrote:
Wind farms are hardly the bird slayers they're made out to be—here's why
An interesting note from the article. The Royal Society for the Protection of Birds operates a large sanctuary called The Lodge, which is home to numerous species of wild birds. And how does The Lodge get its power?BackInTex wrote:What is not given in the summary (and I'm not paying $19.95 for the full report) is how they determine the number and type of birds killed by each form of generation. I'd be interested to see for gas fired generation how and what kinds of birds are being killed. Also I'd like the separation of coal from natural gas, natural gas being the cleanest fossil fuel, most economic and available energy resource we have in the USA.silverscreenselect wrote:
Wind farms are hardly the bird slayers they're made out to be—here's why
If natural gas fired plants are killing grackles in high numbers, who cares? They are a menace. I suspect by grouping coal in with natural gas you get the higher numbers because of coals environmental impacts (loss of habitat from mining and pollutants from burning).
https://www.rspb.org.uk/reserves-and-ev ... /the-lodgeIn 2016 we built a wind turbine on a field adjacent to our headquarters at The Lodge near Sandy, Bedfordshire. It is found in Sandy Ridge, a field south of the B1042 Potton Road and east of the RSPB's Gatehouse shop. Siting the turbine close by means The Lodge receives energy directly from the turbine making it the most efficient location. Wind speed data suggested the turbine should produce 1.85 million kWh per annum, which is enough to power the equivalent of approximately 450 medium-sized homes.
At our current rate of consumption, this means the turbine should generate the equivalent of over half of the RSPB's total UK electricity needs across 127 sites, ranging from single person offices to our UK HQ. The wind turbine is predicted to reduce UK carbon emissions by around 600 tonnes of CO2 every year. It is expected to directly reduce RSPB The Lodge’s carbon emissions from energy usage by up to 63 per cent.
Wind turbines will typically ‘pay back’ the energy used during the manufacturing process in less than 8 months.
The wind turbine is 100 metres at its highest point, with a rotor diameter of 53 metres. In severe storms, when winds reach a speed of 25 m/s or more, the turbine will automatically shut down due to health and safety requirements set by the turbine manufacturers.
Ecotricity, in partnership with the RSPB, conducted assessments over three years on all aspects of the wind turbine proposal and how it could affect the surrounding area. We completed sufficient research to confirm that Sandy Ridge is a suitable site for a single wind turbine.
So you've said.Bob Juch wrote:100% of my power back home in Arizona comes from wind farms.
It's worth repeating.BackInTex wrote:So you've said.Bob Juch wrote:100% of my power back home in Arizona comes from wind farms.