Read the report.BackInTex wrote:silverscreenselect wrote:What the two years was about was seeing about (1) who might have conspired along with Trump (if you'll recall, Nixon never went to jail on Watergate but a lot of his buddies did) and (2) laying out the evidence so that Congress would do its job and impeach the President. That may well prove to be futile as long as the Republican Senate is willing to give Trump a blank check, but you can't fault Mueller for laying out the evidence of obstruction of justice.flockofseagulls104 wrote: what the fuck was the 2 years and umpteen millions of dollars about?
LOL
What did Trump do that was more obstructive than destroying an email server and phones that were subjects of an "investigation {wink} {wink}"?
Also, where in the Mueller report did he discuss the dossier that was used to obtain the FISA warrants? Any investigation of alleged misdeeds should certainly include the evidence that led up to the need for an investigation.
Mueller discussed the warrants in Volume 1, and clearly laid out the process resulting in the warrants. The Steele dossier merely corroborated information already in the FBI's possession regarding Russian efforts to interfere with our election.
Donny obstructed justice by firing the FBI Director because he was investigating Donny's campaign and wouldn't pledge personal loyalty.
Donny obstructed justice by trying to get Attorney General Sessions to reverse his recusal decision so he could rein in Mueller.
Donny obstructed justice by trying to get the White House Counsel to fire Mueller.
Donny obstructed justice by trying to get witnesses to lie to Mueller or to refuse to cooperate with Mueller.
And he did all this deliberately, a point I emphasize only because Secretary Clinton did not deliberately destroy a damn thing in order to evade an investigation (which was obviously undertaken for partisan purposes anyway). --Bob