Want more proof as to Obama's Socialism?

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

Want more proof as to Obama's Socialism?

#1 Post by Sir_Galahad » Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:41 am

"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13605
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

#2 Post by BackInTex » Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:55 am

Thanks Sirg.

Very scary.

I think most people who truly understand what Obama stands for, and are true freedom loving Americans, would rather have a 3rd term of GWB than the first year of Obama. As bad as that would be.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Inigo Montoya
Merry Man
Posts: 1
Joined: Fri Sep 05, 2008 8:55 am
Location: Florin

#3 Post by Inigo Montoya » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:02 am

To: Sir Galahad

Re: Socialism

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

#4 Post by Sir_Galahad » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:11 am

Inigo Montoya wrote:To: Sir Galahad

Re: Socialism

You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.
Per Mr. Webster: "a theory or system of social organization that advocates the vesting of the ownership and control of the means of production and distribution, of capital, land, etc., in the community as a whole."

Or, how about Marxism: "the economic and political theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels that hold that human actions and institutions are economically determined and that class struggle is needed to create historical change and that capitalism will ultimately be superseded by communism"

Sounds to me like what Obama has been preaching.
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
frogman042
Bored Pun-dit
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2008 6:36 am

#5 Post by frogman042 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:13 am

If you find any, please post it - all I saw in those links were paranoid rants with 0 actual facts to back it up.

BTW, feel free to stop using the socialist Police and Fire departments.

---Jay (who is already regretting dipping his toe in a political thread - but at least knows that the expected air date is the same number as the age Karl Marx was when his brother Hermann died - (beware he might have faked his death and could be lurking under your bed!!!))

User avatar
dimmzy
Posts: 925
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:23 am

#6 Post by dimmzy » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:28 am

What do you mean, GOING socialist?

Didn't I just buy a piece of Morgan Stanley?

And what about Halliburton? I'm waiting for my "dividend" from them, especially now that they've taken my money and run to Dubai, courtesy of Dick.

User avatar
eyégor
???????
Posts: 1139
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:26 am
Location: Trollsberg

#7 Post by eyégor » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:42 am

I must be getting increasingly impatient as I approach my dotage.

I am greatly irritated by editorials that drive home their point with a sledgehammer in lieu of a more precise implement. The come from all sides of the political spectrum. The fact that these particular screeds are from the Adam Smith segment doesn't matter.

They are all similar.

Posit something guaranteed to scare the bejesus out of people.

Find references in your target's words that confirm your assertion, helpfully translating any portion that isn't hysteria inducing on its face.

Throw in some extraneous crap.

repeat.

"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.
Obama also talks about "restoring fairness to the economy," code for soaking the "rich" —
Is there a socialist speaker's manual that I'm not aware of, full of codewords ans super secret phrases? It must be well distributed since
Obama never spelled out the meaning of the term, but he didn't have to. His audience knew what he meant, judging from its thumping approval.
Then, move on to
"Universal national service" (a la Havana).
Ok, but isn't it also (a la Tel Aviv) or (a la pre WWI Berlin) or even (a la colonial America's militias)?

sprinkle in
Amid all this, Obama reunited with his late father's communist tribe in Kenya, the Luo, during trips to Africa.
Huh? I have forebearers who took up arms against a lawful government, pretty radical stuff. For the record, I also have many relatives who sided with said government, now happily residing in the Maritimes.

The sad thing is, there may be a legitimate issue here, or in this editorials brothers from across the political spectrum.

I just won't be able to hear what they want to say, given the repugnant way that it is said.

User avatar
Rexer25
It's all his fault. That'll be $10.
Posts: 2899
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:57 am
Location: Just this side of nowhere

#8 Post by Rexer25 » Fri Sep 05, 2008 9:49 am

eyégor wrote:I must be getting increasingly impatient as I approach my dotage.

I am greatly irritated by editorials that drive home their point with a sledgehammer in lieu of a more precise implement. The come from all sides of the political spectrum. The fact that these particular screeds are from the Adam Smith segment doesn't matter.

They are all similar.

Posit something guaranteed to scare the bejesus out of people.

Find references in your target's words that confirm your assertion, helpfully translating any portion that isn't hysteria inducing on its face.

Throw in some extraneous crap.

repeat.

"Economic justice" simply means punishing the successful and redistributing their wealth by government fiat. It's a euphemism for socialism.
Obama also talks about "restoring fairness to the economy," code for soaking the "rich" —
Is there a socialist speaker's manual that I'm not aware of, full of codewords ans super secret phrases? It must be well distributed since
Obama never spelled out the meaning of the term, but he didn't have to. His audience knew what he meant, judging from its thumping approval.
Then, move on to
"Universal national service" (a la Havana).
Ok, but isn't it also (a la Tel Aviv) or (a la pre WWI Berlin) or even (a la colonial America's militias)?

sprinkle in
Amid all this, Obama reunited with his late father's communist tribe in Kenya, the Luo, during trips to Africa.
Huh? I have forebearers who took up arms against a lawful government, pretty radical stuff. For the record, I also have many relatives who sided with said government, now happily residing in the Maritimes.

The sad thing is, there may be a legitimate issue here, or in this editorials brothers from across the political spectrum.

I just won't be able to hear what they want to say, given the repugnant way that it is said.
Rec
Enough already. It's my fault! Get over it!

That'll be $10, please.

Post Reply