I am truly mad, letter to the editor kind of mad

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7634
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

I am truly mad, letter to the editor kind of mad

#1 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:31 am

Which of course has a double meaning, angry and a bit insane, as only cranks write letters to the editor.

James "Play Station Climatology" Hansen has written a op-ed for The State newspaper opposing a coal fired electric generating plant proposed for my county. We wants us to live in energy poverty while he lives it up on Heinz Foundation money. Here we are having one of the coolest Augusts that I can remember, the sunspot cycle is very quiet and he's fantasizing about computer models. I plan on generating substantial carbon outputs later this evening, as I write a letter suggesting that he butt out.

http://www.thestate.com/editorial-colum ... 01134.html
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27071
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

#2 Post by Bob Juch » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:35 am

I agree with Hansen 100%.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7634
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

#3 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:41 am

Bob Juch wrote:I agree with Hansen 100%.
Well, I must be mistaken.
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
christie1111
11:11
Posts: 11630
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:54 am
Location: CT

#4 Post by christie1111 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:30 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:I agree with Hansen 100%.
Well, I must be mistaken.
Too funny TMITSS!
"A bed without a quilt is like the sky without stars"

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13600
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

#5 Post by BackInTex » Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:51 am

Dr. Hansen, aka Chicken Little, is director of the NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies. His 1988 congressional testimony brought national attention to global warming. This column is his personal opinion.
So he's the one.

I wonder what he thinks of the warming on Mars.

500 tons of CO2? I'm looking a a small cloud right now, probably 1,000 tons of H2O.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
cindy.wellman
LOLOLOL
Posts: 1641
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 2:42 pm
Location: Alaska

Re: I am truly mad, letter to the editor kind of mad

#6 Post by cindy.wellman » Mon Aug 25, 2008 10:51 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:Which of course has a double meaning, angry and a bit insane, as only cranks write letters to the editor.

James "Play Station Climatology" Hansen has written a op-ed for The State newspaper opposing a coal fired electric generating plant proposed for my county. We wants us to live in energy poverty while he lives it up on Heinz Foundation money. Here we are having one of the coolest Augusts that I can remember, the sunspot cycle is very quiet and he's fantasizing about computer models. I plan on generating substantial carbon outputs later this evening, as I write a letter suggesting that he butt out.

http://www.thestate.com/editorial-colum ... 01134.html
This is similar to our very own Frank van der Sloot of Melaleuca notoriety and his opposition of any of the wind turbines here in the Idaho Falls area. I did write a letter, as I was peeved with his position of being against them. His stance was that he felt they compromised the pristine views in our area. Sheesh.

User avatar
jarnon
Posts: 6896
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 9:52 pm
Location: Merion, Pa.

Re: I am truly mad, letter to the editor kind of mad

#7 Post by jarnon » Mon Aug 25, 2008 6:55 pm

I worked for Dr. Hansen at GISS. He's a brilliant scientist with the courage to speak his mind even when it annoys the politicians he works for.

BTW, you've all seen the GISS building (near Columbia Univ. in uptown Manhattan). Tom's Restaurant, whose exterior was used on Seinfeld, is on the ground floor of the GISS building.

User avatar
Beebs52
Queen of Wack
Posts: 16408
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:38 am
Location: Location.Location.Location

Re: I am truly mad, letter to the editor kind of mad

#8 Post by Beebs52 » Mon Aug 25, 2008 9:13 pm

jarnon wrote:I worked for Dr. Hansen at GISS. He's a brilliant scientist with the courage to speak his mind even when it annoys the politicians he works for.

BTW, you've all seen the GISS building (near Columbia Univ. in uptown Manhattan). Tom's Restaurant, whose exterior was used on Seinfeld, is on the ground floor of the GISS building.
Of course, brilliant scientist doesn't always equate with correct scientist in the grand scheme of things. Subjective evaluation as opposed to objective.
Well, then

Post Reply