Bringing Up Baby and old movies in general
-
- Posts: 4784
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm
Bringing Up Baby and old movies in general
A few years ago, I posted how much I like Bringing Up Baby and might place it in my Top Ten.
Just rented it again recently and the kids loved it. The youngest one (sparked by the B&W) asked me to rent that movie again about the man who goes fishing and the sharks eat the fish. So The Old Man and The Sea will be coming again soon. I Love NETFLIX (which gave me the means) and WWTBAM and J!(The original motivation) to watch some of the great classic films.
A book just came today about sharing old movies with your kids. I forget the title-anyway, the opening vignette is about his 9YO BDay party that involved a showing of Bringing Up Baby-her choice and the 18 other kids loved it.
Just rented it again recently and the kids loved it. The youngest one (sparked by the B&W) asked me to rent that movie again about the man who goes fishing and the sharks eat the fish. So The Old Man and The Sea will be coming again soon. I Love NETFLIX (which gave me the means) and WWTBAM and J!(The original motivation) to watch some of the great classic films.
A book just came today about sharing old movies with your kids. I forget the title-anyway, the opening vignette is about his 9YO BDay party that involved a showing of Bringing Up Baby-her choice and the 18 other kids loved it.
- silverscreenselect
- Posts: 24198
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
- Contact:
One of the biggest problems I have with Blockbuster is that their selection is so overwhelmingly skewed in favor of the "big new release of the week." If you want a movie that's over ten years old, your selection is pretty much limited to kiddie films and a handful of the best known films of all time. And there's only so many times you can see Gone with the Wind or Casablanca.
Part of it is due to audience tastes. They have limited shelf space in each store and if something doesn't rent, they get rid of it. But I think part of that is due to the type people who work there. You have 18 year old clerks who don't know anything about older movies, so they're not in a position to recommend older titles so no one rents them.
The best thing about shows like the upcoming AFI tributes is that it gives audiences a chance to be exposed, however briefly, to entertaining older movies, and fortunately Netflix is a handy alternative for most people.
It's not just younger people who are ignorant about the older movies. When my mother was alive, whenever she would stay with us, she would watch some of these 30's films on AMC or TCM during the day. The prints were often in horrible condition, and when my wife would keep her company, she would later tell me that she couldn't see how mother could bear to watch these films which looked so horrible.
Since I've been collecting DVD's though, I've been able to put together a pretty good collection of older movies and they are usually in very good to excellent condition. When we watch one of these now, my wife is impressed both with how good the films look and the overall quality.
I don't think that the older movies are necessarily better than the current ones. They made far more films in the 1930's and 40's than are released today (although if you count direct to video releases and TV movies, the numbers are closer to equal). The difference is that the junk made back then has disappeared, in many cases literally, as master prints no longer exist for these films, while current junk is still showing up on theater screens and video store shelves. The good films back then still hold up well in terms of acting and writing though.
Part of it is due to audience tastes. They have limited shelf space in each store and if something doesn't rent, they get rid of it. But I think part of that is due to the type people who work there. You have 18 year old clerks who don't know anything about older movies, so they're not in a position to recommend older titles so no one rents them.
The best thing about shows like the upcoming AFI tributes is that it gives audiences a chance to be exposed, however briefly, to entertaining older movies, and fortunately Netflix is a handy alternative for most people.
It's not just younger people who are ignorant about the older movies. When my mother was alive, whenever she would stay with us, she would watch some of these 30's films on AMC or TCM during the day. The prints were often in horrible condition, and when my wife would keep her company, she would later tell me that she couldn't see how mother could bear to watch these films which looked so horrible.
Since I've been collecting DVD's though, I've been able to put together a pretty good collection of older movies and they are usually in very good to excellent condition. When we watch one of these now, my wife is impressed both with how good the films look and the overall quality.
I don't think that the older movies are necessarily better than the current ones. They made far more films in the 1930's and 40's than are released today (although if you count direct to video releases and TV movies, the numbers are closer to equal). The difference is that the junk made back then has disappeared, in many cases literally, as master prints no longer exist for these films, while current junk is still showing up on theater screens and video store shelves. The good films back then still hold up well in terms of acting and writing though.
-
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:44 am
- Location: Baltimore
- Contact:
I absolutely LOVE Bringing Up Baby. Cary Grant's performance never fails to amaze me - how such a suave, handsome leading man was so comfortable with slapstick comedy and pulled it off so well. Plus I love anything Katharine Hepburn did as well.
I am an old movie fanatic - while everyone else around me watches all sorts of TV, I stick to the movie channels. I have too many favorites to name here - what does everyone else like?
I am an old movie fanatic - while everyone else around me watches all sorts of TV, I stick to the movie channels. I have too many favorites to name here - what does everyone else like?
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
Bringing up Baby is on my Blockbuster queue. One of the great things about the Blockbuster total access is that I use it to catch the older movies that I never have seen. I then return them to the store to get the more current releases.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- ToLiveIsToFly
- Posts: 2364
- Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 11:34 am
- Location: Kalamazoo
- Contact:
- nitrah55
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: Section 239, Yankee Stadium
You have to remember that Cary Grant started his career as an entertainer as an acrobat. Honest. That explains how he could be so graceful, and when necessary, klutzy.Robyn wrote:I absolutely LOVE Bringing Up Baby. Cary Grant's performance never fails to amaze me - how such a suave, handsome leading man was so comfortable with slapstick comedy and pulled it off so well.
And how about "The Philadelphia Story?"
In fact, I remember one day many years ago, when I took in a screening of Vertigo in the afternoon and watched The Philadelphia Story that night, and I marvelled that Jimmy Stewart was so different and so good in both of them. Then, I reminded myself of his performances in "Harvey" and "It's a Wonderful Life," each one completely unlike the other.
He could do anything, and still be recognizable.
I am about 25% sure of this.
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
I know many people who believe that Stewart played the same character in just about everything he did.nitrah55 wrote:You have to remember that Cary Grant started his career as an entertainer as an acrobat. Honest. That explains how he could be so graceful, and when necessary, klutzy.Robyn wrote:I absolutely LOVE Bringing Up Baby. Cary Grant's performance never fails to amaze me - how such a suave, handsome leading man was so comfortable with slapstick comedy and pulled it off so well.
And how about "The Philadelphia Story?"
In fact, I remember one day many years ago, when I took in a screening of Vertigo in the afternoon and watched The Philadelphia Story that night, and I marvelled that Jimmy Stewart was so different and so good in both of them. Then, I reminded myself of his performances in "Harvey" and "It's a Wonderful Life," each one completely unlike the other.
He could do anything, and still be recognizable.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- nitrah55
- Posts: 1613
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:46 am
- Location: Section 239, Yankee Stadium
Well, clearly I disagree. Scotty Ferguson is not Elwood P. Dowd. And there are plenty of actors who could do one or the other, but not both.TheCalvinator24 wrote:I know many people who believe that Stewart played the same character in just about everything he did.nitrah55 wrote:You have to remember that Cary Grant started his career as an entertainer as an acrobat. Honest. That explains how he could be so graceful, and when necessary, klutzy.Robyn wrote:I absolutely LOVE Bringing Up Baby. Cary Grant's performance never fails to amaze me - how such a suave, handsome leading man was so comfortable with slapstick comedy and pulled it off so well.
And how about "The Philadelphia Story?"
In fact, I remember one day many years ago, when I took in a screening of Vertigo in the afternoon and watched The Philadelphia Story that night, and I marvelled that Jimmy Stewart was so different and so good in both of them. Then, I reminded myself of his performances in "Harvey" and "It's a Wonderful Life," each one completely unlike the other.
He could do anything, and still be recognizable.
I am about 25% sure of this.
- TheCalvinator24
- Posts: 4884
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:50 am
- Location: Wyoming
- Contact:
I am in your camp. I played the Stewart character in The Philadelphia Story, and if he had played that the same way he played George Bailey, Jeff Smith, or Elwood P. Dowd, he would have flopped.nitrah55 wrote:Well, clearly I disagree. Scotty Ferguson is not Elwood P. Dowd. And there are plenty of actors who could do one or the other, but not both.TheCalvinator24 wrote:I know many people who believe that Stewart played the same character in just about everything he did.nitrah55 wrote: You have to remember that Cary Grant started his career as an entertainer as an acrobat. Honest. That explains how he could be so graceful, and when necessary, klutzy.
And how about "The Philadelphia Story?"
In fact, I remember one day many years ago, when I took in a screening of Vertigo in the afternoon and watched The Philadelphia Story that night, and I marvelled that Jimmy Stewart was so different and so good in both of them. Then, I reminded myself of his performances in "Harvey" and "It's a Wonderful Life," each one completely unlike the other.
He could do anything, and still be recognizable.
It is our choices that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities. —Albus Dumbledore
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 27033
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
He was a stiltwalker. I'm not sure how acrobatic that was.nitrah55 wrote:You have to remember that Cary Grant started his career as an entertainer as an acrobat. Honest. That explains how he could be so graceful, and when necessary, klutzy.Robyn wrote:I absolutely LOVE Bringing Up Baby. Cary Grant's performance never fails to amaze me - how such a suave, handsome leading man was so comfortable with slapstick comedy and pulled it off so well.
And how about "The Philadelphia Story?"
In fact, I remember one day many years ago, when I took in a screening of Vertigo in the afternoon and watched The Philadelphia Story that night, and I marvelled that Jimmy Stewart was so different and so good in both of them. Then, I reminded myself of his performances in "Harvey" and "It's a Wonderful Life," each one completely unlike the other.
He could do anything, and still be recognizable.
Do you know he knocked out a front tooth when he was a teenager? It was never replaced but the other teeth closed around the hole and gave him a perfect smile. Otherwise he might have been buck-toothed!
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)
Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.
Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.