Going nuclear

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Message
Author
User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Going nuclear

#26 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:47 pm

Bob78164 wrote:At least in my practice, precluding young attorneys from private meetings with me would absolutely limit their opportunities.
I don't think there's an age limit for receiving unwanted sexual advances.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13736
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Going nuclear

#27 Post by BackInTex » Fri Apr 07, 2017 2:51 pm

Bob78164 wrote:
Appa23 wrote:Well, I have no young male attorneys right now, so . . . . :)

Also, I don't think that I said anything about limiting anyone from any opportunities.
At least in my practice, precluding young attorneys from private meetings with me would absolutely limit their opportunities. Among other things, that's when and how I give feedback about the quality of their work and changes I'd like to see on a forward-going basis, as well as the things they've done well. In short, that's how they learn and when my comments constitute criticism, I see no reason to give them in public. (When young attorneys do something very, very right that is beyond what I expect from someone of their experience, I tend to make my comments very publicly.) Strategy meetings often have to happen behind closed doors for the reasons you've noted. And of course, although client development is not my forte (and not a part of your job description at all), those meetings tend to be one-on-one and occur after hours. --Bob

Our offices have glass walls. Privacy of conversation but not of physical actions. Problems solved (mostly).
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22157
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Going nuclear

#28 Post by Bob78164 » Fri Apr 07, 2017 3:08 pm

BackInTex wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
Appa23 wrote:Well, I have no young male attorneys right now, so . . . . :)

Also, I don't think that I said anything about limiting anyone from any opportunities.
At least in my practice, precluding young attorneys from private meetings with me would absolutely limit their opportunities. Among other things, that's when and how I give feedback about the quality of their work and changes I'd like to see on a forward-going basis, as well as the things they've done well. In short, that's how they learn and when my comments constitute criticism, I see no reason to give them in public. (When young attorneys do something very, very right that is beyond what I expect from someone of their experience, I tend to make my comments very publicly.) Strategy meetings often have to happen behind closed doors for the reasons you've noted. And of course, although client development is not my forte (and not a part of your job description at all), those meetings tend to be one-on-one and occur after hours. --Bob

Our offices have glass walls. Privacy of conversation but not of physical actions. Problems solved (mostly).
We're moving into new space in about two weeks. They're still building it out but I think most of our offices will have glass walls.

But it's easy for harassment to be conducted purely through words, so I don't think it's much of a solution. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
elwoodblues
Posts: 3890
Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:36 pm
Location: Texas

Re: Going nuclear

#29 Post by elwoodblues » Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:10 pm

earendel wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:The Senate is a totally dysfunctional body. We should go back to the original structure of the Senate. Senators should be elected by the State Legislatures and represent the State. (And they should have term limits).

Support the Article V Convention of the States.
Should we also return to those halcyon days when only property owners could vote?
Gorsuch is a step in that direction.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13736
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Going nuclear

#30 Post by BackInTex » Sat Apr 08, 2017 8:12 am

elwoodblues wrote:
earendel wrote:
flockofseagulls104 wrote:The Senate is a totally dysfunctional body. We should go back to the original structure of the Senate. Senators should be elected by the State Legislatures and represent the State. (And they should have term limits).

Support the Article V Convention of the States.
Should we also return to those halcyon days when only property owners could vote?
Gorsuch is a step in that direction.
No he's not. Don't be a fool.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22157
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: Going nuclear

#31 Post by Bob78164 » Sun Apr 09, 2017 11:41 am

I am becoming concerned that this thread will soon become equally appropriate for a discussion of North Korea. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

Post Reply