I am sure most of us have seen the awesome viral video.
https://medium.com/@benthompson/breakin ... .jiftmejh5
Over-analyzing the BBC Video
-
mrkelley23
- Posts: 6600
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:48 pm
- Location: Somewhere between Bureaucracy and Despair
Re: Over-analyzing the BBC Video
That video came at a very good time for me -- the end of a rough week with two long weeks to go until vacation. I can't remember when I've gut-laughed like that at an internet video. And, like this writer, I"ve watched it multiple times, and it just keeps getting funnier.
For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for Nature cannot be fooled. -- Richard Feynman
-
Spock
- Posts: 4860
- Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2007 8:01 pm
Re: Over-analyzing the BBC Video
I hadn't noticed the woman's pants or the books on the bed until I read this.mrkelley23 wrote:That video came at a very good time for me -- the end of a rough week with two long weeks to go until vacation. I can't remember when I've gut-laughed like that at an internet video. And, like this writer, I"ve watched it multiple times, and it just keeps getting funnier.
What can I say-I have to go with the baby in the walker-"What's going on in here?"
Just watched it again and noticed the books falling off the bed.
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
Re: Over-analyzing the BBC Video
It all makes sense now.
"They thought he was skyping grandma." Professor Robert Kelly, his wife Jung a Kim and kids from viral BBC interview.
All the FaceTime and Skyping grandmoms understand
"They thought he was skyping grandma." Professor Robert Kelly, his wife Jung a Kim and kids from viral BBC interview.
All the FaceTime and Skyping grandmoms understand
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.