Silly Oscars Rule Change

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Silly Oscars Rule Change

#1 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:21 am

This one actually occurred a couple of weeks ago but I just heard about it. The MPAA has adopted a rule that a film can "only" submit a maximum of 10 actors and 10 actresses for Oscar consideration. I can't ever recall a film in which there were more than 10 actors (or actresses) remotely by the slightest chance worthy of an Oscar, but apparently the Academy is worried that voters won't be able to keep all the many worthy performers in the last Transformers movie separate.

By the way, if anyone has some time, read the article underneath the Oscar one. It lists well-known and (mostly) acclaimed actors who have never received an Oscar nomination. Of course, as they acknowledge, that list fortunately shrinks over time. Gary Oldman and Christopher Plummer only received their first nominations very recently.

http://www.goldderby.com/news/6714/osca ... 79086.html
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13742
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#2 Post by BackInTex » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:48 am

silverscreenselect wrote:This one actually occurred a couple of weeks ago but I just heard about it. The MPAA has adopted a rule that a film can "only" submit a maximum of 10 actors and 10 actresses for Oscar consideration. I can't ever recall a film in which there were more than 10 actors (or actresses) remotely by the slightest chance worthy of an Oscar, but apparently the Academy is worried that voters won't be able to keep all the many worthy performers in the last Transformers movie separate.

By the way, if anyone has some time, read the article underneath the Oscar one. It lists well-known and (mostly) acclaimed actors who have never received an Oscar nomination. Of course, as they acknowledge, that list fortunately shrinks over time. Gary Oldman and Christopher Plummer only received their first nominations very recently.

http://www.goldderby.com/news/6714/osca ... 79086.html
I think that new rule may have been adopted in due to The Expendables III. Or a possible remaike of IAMMMMW.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6685
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#3 Post by franktangredi » Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:21 am

Some of those 'shocking' omissions aren't all that shocking. (How many movies has Carol Burnett made, and can you name one where you thought, 'Wow, that's an Oscar role!')

The more shocking list is actors who are now dead who never received Oscar nominations, and never will. This would include Edward G. Robinson, Myrna Loy, Joan Bennett, Joseph Cotten, Peter Lorre, Fred MacMurray, Betty Field, Robert Walker, Joel McCrea, John Barrymore...

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#4 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:29 am

franktangredi wrote:Some of those 'shocking' omissions aren't all that shocking. (How many movies has Carol Burnett made, and can you name one where you thought, 'Wow, that's an Oscar role!')

The more shocking list is actors who are now dead who never received Oscar nominations, and never will. This would include Edward G. Robinson, Myrna Loy, Joan Bennett, Joseph Cotten, Peter Lorre, Fred MacMurray, Betty Field, Robert Walker, Joel McCrea, John Barrymore...
And all the while George Kennedy looks at his Oscar every night before he goes to bed and smiles.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#5 Post by SportsFan68 » Fri Jul 11, 2014 9:55 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
franktangredi wrote:Some of those 'shocking' omissions aren't all that shocking. (How many movies has Carol Burnett made, and can you name one where you thought, 'Wow, that's an Oscar role!')

The more shocking list is actors who are now dead who never received Oscar nominations, and never will. This would include Edward G. Robinson, Myrna Loy, Joan Bennett, Joseph Cotten, Peter Lorre, Fred MacMurray, Betty Field, Robert Walker, Joel McCrea, John Barrymore...
And all the while George Kennedy looks at his Oscar every night before he goes to bed and smiles.
Any one of the actors nominated that year would do the same thing. John Cassavetes is an excellent actor, but I doubt his role in the Dirty Dozen challenged him much. Same with Gene Hackman in Bonnie and Clyde.

I wish Michael J. Pollard had won. I would have loved to see the guy who pulled off playing a 13 year old kid in Star Trek at age 27 winning an Oscar.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
franktangredi
Posts: 6685
Joined: Tue Feb 12, 2008 4:34 pm

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#6 Post by franktangredi » Fri Jul 11, 2014 10:03 am

silverscreenselect wrote:
franktangredi wrote:Some of those 'shocking' omissions aren't all that shocking. (How many movies has Carol Burnett made, and can you name one where you thought, 'Wow, that's an Oscar role!')

The more shocking list is actors who are now dead who never received Oscar nominations, and never will. This would include Edward G. Robinson, Myrna Loy, Joan Bennett, Joseph Cotten, Peter Lorre, Fred MacMurray, Betty Field, Robert Walker, Joel McCrea, John Barrymore...
And all the while George Kennedy looks at his Oscar every night before he goes to bed and smiles.
Never mind George Kennedy. GEORGE CHAKIRIS!

Who beat out Montgomery Clift, Peter Falk, Jackie Gleason, and George C. Scott. Scott might have won, but that was the first time he turned down the nomination.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#7 Post by Bob Juch » Fri Jul 11, 2014 12:44 pm

franktangredi wrote:Some of those 'shocking' omissions aren't all that shocking. (How many movies has Carol Burnett made, and can you name one where you thought, 'Wow, that's an Oscar role!')
Fourteen and yes, A Wedding.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#8 Post by MarleysGh0st » Fri Jul 11, 2014 1:53 pm

SportsFan68 wrote:I wish Michael J. Pollard had won. I would have loved to see the guy who pulled off playing a 13 year old kid in Star Trek at age 27 winning an Oscar.
Did they specify 13 in the episode? I thought Jahn was at least 17! :wink:
Spoiler
Image

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#9 Post by SportsFan68 » Sat Jul 12, 2014 2:21 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
SportsFan68 wrote:I wish Michael J. Pollard had won. I would have loved to see the guy who pulled off playing a 13 year old kid in Star Trek at age 27 winning an Oscar.
Did they specify 13 in the episode? I thought Jahn was at least 17! :wink:
Spoiler
Image
No age was specified, just that he hadn't gone through puberty yet. I said 13 because he looked about 17 to me too.

Kim Darby was 19. John Megna was 15, not too bad.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
Estonut
Evil Genius
Posts: 10495
Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
Location: Garden Grove, CA

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#10 Post by Estonut » Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:53 am

When are the Silly Oscars?
A child of five would understand this. Send someone to fetch a child of five.
Groucho Marx

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: Silly Oscars Rule Change

#11 Post by Bob Juch » Sun Jul 13, 2014 5:29 am

Estonut wrote:When are the Silly Oscars?
In the afternoon the day before the regular ones, just before the Razzies.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

Post Reply