The twenty-five most emasculated, disempowered, henpecked

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7634
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

The twenty-five most emasculated, disempowered, henpecked

#1 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:07 am

Don't we love lists, but I don't see this one showing up on a game show

http://men.style.com/gq/features/landin ... ntent_6697
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#2 Post by peacock2121 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 10:25 am

Too many missing.

User avatar
VAdame
Posts: 1877
Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 11:42 am
Location: da 'Burgh!

#3 Post by VAdame » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:54 am

Mark Consuelos? Because Kelly is "an older woman"?

Hello?! She's a whole 6 months older than he is -- BFD!!!

Personally, I always thought they were the exception to the "Real Life Couples Don't Have Screen Chemistry" rule of acting.

Unlike John Callahan & Eva LaRue, who were always just plain icky.

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#4 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:55 am

Our female rabbit, Izzy, shows dominance over our male rabbit, FooFoo, by mounting him.

lilclyde54
Posts: 1988
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 3:24 pm
Location: The Deep South

#5 Post by lilclyde54 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:56 am

Ah, the battle of the sexes. Always fascinating.
I felt the change

Time meant nothing and never would again

User avatar
PlacentiaSoccerMom
Posts: 8134
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
Location: Placentia, CA
Contact:

#6 Post by PlacentiaSoccerMom » Sat Mar 22, 2008 11:57 am

VAdame wrote:Mark Consuelos? Because Kelly is "an older woman"?
Yet if a guy marries a woman who is six months younger it doesn't even matter.

User avatar
fantine33
Posts: 1299
Joined: Thu Oct 25, 2007 6:15 pm

#7 Post by fantine33 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 12:56 pm

PlacentiaSoccerMom wrote:
VAdame wrote:Mark Consuelos? Because Kelly is "an older woman"?
Yet if a guy marries a woman who is six months younger it doesn't even matter.
Or six years. Or decades. Or whatever.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#8 Post by peacock2121 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 1:06 pm

A man publically adores his wife and is not afraid to let the whole world know it - you wanna call that whipped - fine - let's have many, many more men on that list.

User avatar
takinover
Posts: 761
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:34 pm
Location: Parts Unknown
Contact:

#9 Post by takinover » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:29 pm

If given a choice, I think I would rather be pussy whipped than obsessed with other peoples' relationships.

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#10 Post by peacock2121 » Sat Mar 22, 2008 2:51 pm

takinover wrote:If given a choice, I think I would rather be pussy whipped than obsessed with other peoples' relationships.
zing!

User avatar
Sir_Galahad
Posts: 1516
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:47 pm
Location: In The Heartland

#11 Post by Sir_Galahad » Sat Mar 22, 2008 4:46 pm

takinover wrote:If given a choice, I think I would rather be pussy whipped than obsessed with other peoples' relationships.
<LOL>

Now there's a quote to remember!
"All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke

Perhaps the Hokey Pokey IS what it's all about...

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#12 Post by ne1410s » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:12 am

A man publically adores his wife and is not afraid to let the whole world know it -
But, God forfend, a woman wear a tshirt that says "Keep Up!" to show her adoration. There must be two sets of rules.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#13 Post by peacock2121 » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:34 am

ne1410s wrote:
A man publically adores his wife and is not afraid to let the whole world know it -
But, God forfend, a woman wear a tshirt that says "Keep Up!" to show her adoration. There must be two sets of rules.
"Keep Up" was not about expressing adoration for Keep Up Boy. It was about express displeasure for another man.

Same set of rules.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#14 Post by ne1410s » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:38 am

"Keep Up" was not about expressing adoration for Keep Up Boy.
Of course it was. Two sets of rules.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#15 Post by peacock2121 » Sun Mar 23, 2008 9:54 am

ne1410s wrote:
"Keep Up" was not about expressing adoration for Keep Up Boy.
Of course it was. Two sets of rules.
Say more about that. What do you see that I don't?

She said it was "a message to all you turtles out there." How can that be expressing adoration for Keep Up Boy when she said it was directed at the turtles?

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#16 Post by ne1410s » Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:07 pm

Say more about that.
You're not the boss of me....

Rory Sabbatini was the object of much public scorn from announcers and his fellow golfers. According to Tim Rosaforte, one of the Golf Channel's "experts", many of his fellow pros supported his stand against slow play--secretly. How gutless. This carries over to other professions and that is how we end up with clueless lawyers, teachers, doctors, and Indian chiefs. Their peers just look the other way. Ms. Sabbatini chose to stand by her man plus her tshirt spoke what many were thinking but were too lacking in intestinal fortitude to say.

You don't see it that way. I do. Ask professional golfers what their two biggest gripes are and you will hear: Pro-ams and slow play. Pretty much in that order.

Do not bite me...I bruise easily.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

User avatar
peacock2121
Posts: 18451
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:58 am

#17 Post by peacock2121 » Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:29 pm

I am not gonna bite you, nor am I gonna tell you to bite me.

There are distinctions I see that you don't. That is what I thought was true and your further explaination showed that.

I said she wasn't publically adoring her man - she wasn't - she was standing up for him, supporting his actions and not backing down. I have those things distinct from adoring him.

I can and do stand up for people, support what they are doing and don't back down and there is no way I would say I adore them.

Then, there are people I adore who do something that I will not stand up for or support for doing it.

I still think he went about displaying his displeasure in the totally wrong way. I think it was unprofessional and hot-headish.

User avatar
ne1410s
Posts: 2961
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 5:26 pm
Location: The Friendly Confines

#18 Post by ne1410s » Sun Mar 23, 2008 1:42 pm

I think it was unprofessional and hot-headish.
It was only considered "unprofessional", by some, because his peers allow slow play. I thought it was a great move and focused some attention on a real problem in golf--not just professional golf. When most were piling on Mr. Sabbatini, Ms. Sabbatini would have none of it. I thought then and now that her support for her husband was admirable and quite brave.
"When you argue with a fool, there are two fools in the argument."

Post Reply