RI? Jang Song Thaek

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
bazodee
Posts: 944
Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 10:23 am
Location: Atlanta, Georgia

RI? Jang Song Thaek

#1 Post by bazodee » Thu Dec 12, 2013 4:17 pm

You know that guy that North Korean leader Kim Jong Un publicly humiliated and purged two days ago (his uncle)? Well, evidently he's been executed.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/12/1 ... 35294.html

User avatar
SportsFan68
No Scritches!!!
Posts: 21300
Joined: Thu Oct 11, 2007 8:36 pm
Location: God's Country

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#2 Post by SportsFan68 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:03 am

Creepy! I won't be traveling to Korea anytime soon.
-- In Iroquois society, leaders are encouraged to remember seven generations in the past and consider seven generations in the future when making decisions that affect the people.
-- America would be a better place if leaders would do more long-term thinking. -- Wilma Mankiller

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#3 Post by Bob Juch » Fri Dec 13, 2013 5:41 am

Sounds like he's using 1984, Hamlet, and The Prince as his manuals.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#4 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:54 am

Tutti frutti, oh Rudy
Tutti frutti, oh Rudy
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#5 Post by silverscreenselect » Fri Dec 13, 2013 9:13 am

Mea culpa and my apologies for not noticing the earlier post before I made mine last night.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#6 Post by MarleysGh0st » Fri Dec 13, 2013 11:58 am

silverscreenselect wrote:Mea culpa and my apologies for not noticing the earlier post before I made mine last night.
I think things have gone far beyond the initial repetition of the thread. :roll:

That was kind of interesting, just from the exact duplication of the subject line.

User avatar
littlebeast13
Dumbass
Posts: 31595
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 7:20 pm
Location: Between the Sterilite and the Farberware
Contact:

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#7 Post by littlebeast13 » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:06 pm

MarleysGh0st wrote:
silverscreenselect wrote:Mea culpa and my apologies for not noticing the earlier post before I made mine last night.
I think things have gone far beyond the initial repetition of the thread. :roll:

That was kind of interesting, just from the exact duplication of the subject line.

That was why I posted the third iteration of it... because SSS used the same RI? as bazodee even though he obviously didn't notice the original due to the proliferation of transcript posts brought forward yesterday. I don't think I had seen the RI? used before, so it was really odd and ripe to be mocked....

lb13

User avatar
MarleysGh0st
Posts: 27966
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
Location: Elsewhere

Re: RI? Jang Song Thaek

#8 Post by MarleysGh0st » Fri Dec 13, 2013 12:15 pm

littlebeast13 wrote:I don't think I had seen the RI? used before, so it was really odd and ripe to be mocked....
It's certainly more provocative than the neutral Jang Song Thaek is dead.

Post Reply