-135.8°!

The forum for general posting. Come join the madness. :)
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

-135.8°!

#1 Post by Bob Juch » Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:25 am

A new look at NASA satellite data revealed that Earth set a new record for coldest temperature, as recorded by satellite. It happened in August 2010 when it hit -135.8 degrees. Then on July 31 of this year, it came close again: -135.3 degrees.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2 ... d/3950019/
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13745
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: -135.8°!

#2 Post by BackInTex » Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:27 am

That causes some serious shrinkage just thinking about it.
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
themanintheseersuckersuit
Posts: 7635
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
Location: South Carolina

Re: -135.8°!

#3 Post by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:38 am

Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
Suitguy is not bitter.

feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive

The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.

User avatar
silverscreenselect
Posts: 24669
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:21 pm
Contact:

Re: -135.8°!

#4 Post by silverscreenselect » Tue Dec 10, 2013 8:51 am

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
That explains the really thick fog we had that day.
Check out our website: http://www.silverscreenvideos.com

User avatar
smilergrogan
Posts: 1529
Joined: Thu Jan 24, 2008 1:22 pm
Location: under a big W

Re: -135.8°!

#5 Post by smilergrogan » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:11 pm

themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: -135.8°!

#6 Post by Bob Juch » Tue Dec 10, 2013 12:18 pm

smilergrogan wrote:
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.
But if it ever gets down to −346°F then the nitrogen will freeze. :P
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13745
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: -135.8°!

#7 Post by BackInTex » Tue Dec 10, 2013 1:33 pm

smilergrogan wrote:
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.
Yeah, that's what I was thinkng, too. :wink:
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Bob78164
Bored Moderator
Posts: 22160
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:02 pm
Location: By the phone

Re: -135.8°!

#8 Post by Bob78164 » Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:18 am

smilergrogan wrote:
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
Carbon dioxide has no liquid state at pressures below 5.1 standard atmospheres (520 kPa). At 1 atmosphere (near mean sea level pressure), the gas deposits directly to a solid at temperatures below −78.5 °C (−109.3 °F; 194.7 K)
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.
Thanks. I hadn't realized that could happen. --Bob
"Question with boldness even the existence of a God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." Thomas Jefferson

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: -135.8°!

#9 Post by Bob Juch » Wed Dec 11, 2013 9:56 am

Bob78164 wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.
Thanks. I hadn't realized that could happen. --Bob
What he mentioned but didn't make clear is that Earth's normal atmosphere is just 0.04% CO2. Many people don't know it's just 21% oxygen.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
BackInTex
Posts: 13745
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 12:43 pm
Location: In Texas of course!

Re: -135.8°!

#10 Post by BackInTex » Wed Dec 11, 2013 10:27 am

Bob Juch wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:
smilergrogan wrote:
This doesn't mean that CO2 will start freezing out of the air when the air temp is below -78.5 C, because that depends on the partial pressure of CO2 in the air. If the relative "humidity" of CO2 was 100% it would be true, but at -78.5 C, where the saturation vapor pressure of CO2 is 1 atmosphere (since that's the normal sublimation point), and the actual partial pressure of CO2 is only about 400 parts per million, the relative "humidity" is only 0.04%. This means the frost point will be far below -78.5 C. Compare to water, where for a 0.04% relative humidity in air at 0C, the frost point calculates to about -70 C.
Thanks. I hadn't realized that could happen. --Bob
What he mentioned but didn't make clear is that Earth's normal atmosphere is just 0.04% CO2. Many people don't know it's just 21% oxygen.
How much of tht 21% is really dioxygen? Is there any naturally occuring pure oxygen?
..what country can preserve it’s liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? let them take arms.
~~ Thomas Jefferson

War is where the government tells you who the bad guy is.
Revolution is when you decide that for yourself.
-- Benjamin Franklin (maybe)

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: -135.8°!

#11 Post by Bob Juch » Wed Dec 11, 2013 11:17 am

BackInTex wrote:
Bob Juch wrote:
Bob78164 wrote:Thanks. I hadn't realized that could happen. --Bob
What he mentioned but didn't make clear is that Earth's normal atmosphere is just 0.04% CO2. Many people don't know it's just 21% oxygen.
How much of tht 21% is really dioxygen? Is there any naturally occuring pure oxygen?
If you mean O instead of O2, there must be an occasional free atom but only until it finds another one and binds to it.
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

User avatar
Bob Juch
Posts: 27133
Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
Contact:

Re: -135.8°!

#12 Post by Bob Juch » Wed Dec 11, 2013 1:45 pm

Just saw this:
South China Morning Post wrote:Scientists discover Earth's 'most powerful' greenhouse gas to date

A new greenhouse gas that is 7,000 times more powerful than carbon dioxide at warming the earth has been discovered by researchers in Canada.

The gas, perfluorotributylamine, has been in use by the electrical industry since the middle of the 20th century.

The chemical, which does not occur naturally, breaks all records for potential impacts on the climate, said the researchers at the University of Toronto's department of chemistry.

"We claim that PFTBA has the highest radiative efficiency of any molecule detected in the atmosphere to date," said Angela Hong, one of the co-authors.

The study, published in the journal Geophysical Research Letters, found PFTBA was 7,100 times more powerful at warming the earth over a 100-year time span than CO {-2}.

However, concentrations of PFTBA in the atmosphere are low - 0.18 parts per trillion in the Toronto area - compared to 400 parts per million for carbon dioxide.

Drew Shindell, a climatologist at Nasa's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said: "This is a warning to us that this gas could have a very, very large impact on climate change - if there were a lot of it.

"Since there is not a lot of it now, we don't have to worry about it at present, but we have to make sure it doesn't grow and become a very large contributor to global warming."
I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.
- Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001)

Si fractum non sit, noli id reficere.

Teach a child to be polite and courteous in the home and, when he grows up, he'll never be able to drive in New Jersey.

Post Reply