MarleysGh0st wrote:Is that like 33 g. of s. on p. and d.?0.2-s SA with 2% in 50 year PE. BC rock. 2008 USGS
Marley is looking to get his ass kicked by the old timers who were here for that.....
MarleysGh0st wrote:Is that like 33 g. of s. on p. and d.?0.2-s SA with 2% in 50 year PE. BC rock. 2008 USGS
notebookboy wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote:Is that like 33 g. of s. on p. and d.?0.2-s SA with 2% in 50 year PE. BC rock. 2008 USGS
Marley is looking to get his ass kicked by the old timers who were here for that.....
Hey, I was here for that! Or did I miss the beginning?notebookboy wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote:Is that like 33 g. of s. on p. and d.?0.2-s SA with 2% in 50 year PE. BC rock. 2008 USGS
Marley is looking to get his ass kicked by the old timers who were here for that.....
It was first posted on June 3, 2000. I had only been here for 10 days myself.....MarleysGh0st wrote:Hey, I was here for that! Or did I miss the beginning?notebookboy wrote:MarleysGh0st wrote: Is that like 33 g. of s. on p. and d.?
Marley is looking to get his ass kicked by the old timers who were here for that.....
Anyway, I was just using that example to point out that the caption for that map was somewhat cryptic!
This is a Most Excellent map. Thanks, Cal!TheCalvinator24 wrote:BTW, here's the latest map from the USGS. It makes our discussion somewhat moot.