The forum for general posting. Come join the madness.

-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#1
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:07 pm
The ship that is, some QE II trivia
It is an extraordinary send-off considering that this is a 41-year-old ship giving up its globetrotting days, not a shiny new vessel embarking on its maiden voyage.
But its longevity is the point. This ship has kept going for more than 40 years, longer than most new vessels will last, I suspect. It has crossed the Atlantic 801 times, sailed around the world 25 times, notched up more than 5.6 million nautical miles during its travels.
It has carried royalty, heads of state, pop stars, celebrities and ordinary folk. For a short time in 1982, while serving as a troop carrier during the Falklands War, its passenger register listed Welsh Guards, Scots Guards and Ghurkhas. For the past nine years it has been the floating home of 89-year-old Beatrice Muller.
There’s no doubt that this illustrious past keeps pulling in the crowds – five of its farewell cruises were full within days of going on sale, while the final voyage to Dubai sold out in 36 minutes as people rushed to secure a place on an historic voyage.
Full marks should go to Cunard, which has never missed a chance to exploit the ship's past, managing the QE2's publicity in a way that makes Max Clifford look like an amateur.
But there is more to QE2 than good press. It may be old and looks a little tired in places but its classic lines, elegance and old-fashioned charm have not dimmed with age. It always reminded me of being at a classy country-house party – friendly, but a little too relentlessly formal for my tastes.
On a more practical level, QE2 was built for speed – it can go backwards faster than any other ship afloat,
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/cruis ... -ship.html
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
MarleysGh0st
- Posts: 27966
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:55 am
- Location: Elsewhere
#2
Post
by MarleysGh0st » Mon Nov 10, 2008 1:14 pm
Is Ms. Muller moving with it to Dubai or has she found new accomodations?
-
Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
#3
Post
by Estonut » Mon Nov 10, 2008 4:58 pm
Speaking of Dubai, has anyone else seen the Discovery Channel special "Impossible City"? It is all about the emergence of Dubai as a luxury travel destination. They have made many architectural advancements in order to build what they have built/are building. One statistic that stuck in my mind was that 25% of the construction cranes currently in operation on the planet are in Dubai. Unbelievable.
-
ulysses5019
- Purveyor of Avatars
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
#4
Post
by ulysses5019 » Mon Nov 10, 2008 5:20 pm
Can her nibs collect unemployment?
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.
-
themanintheseersuckersuit
- Posts: 7635
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 6:37 pm
- Location: South Carolina
#5
Post
by themanintheseersuckersuit » Tue Nov 11, 2008 8:05 am
Estonut wrote:Speaking of Dubai, has anyone else seen the Discovery Channel special "Impossible City"? It is all about the emergence of Dubai as a luxury travel destination. They have made many architectural advancements in order to build what they have built/are building. One statistic that stuck in my mind was that 25% of the construction cranes currently in operation on the planet are in Dubai. Unbelievable.
That report on construction cranes may be a bit exaggerated.
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/dubais- ... ation-341/
Suitguy is not bitter.
feels he represents the many educated and rational onlookers who believe that the hysterical denouncement of lay scepticism is both unwarranted and counter-productive
The problem, then, is that such calls do not address an opposition audience so much as they signal virtue. They talk past those who need convincing. They ignore actual facts and counterargument. And they are irreparably smug.
-
The Huge Manatee
- Merry Man
- Posts: 58
- Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2008 6:55 am
- Location: Lakehurst NJ
#6
Post
by The Huge Manatee » Tue Nov 11, 2008 9:11 am
Somebody else may be retiring early
LONDON — The Queen Elizabeth 2 is docked safely in Southampton harbor after briefly running aground just outside the British port.
A Cunard spokesman says the venerable ocean liner was heading into her home port on Tuesday around 5:30 GMT when the ship hit a sand bank. Two tugboats and the rising tide pulled the ship free.
Eric Flounders says no passengers were injured and that the ship was not damaged.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,449922,00.html
-
Estonut
- Evil Genius
- Posts: 10495
- Joined: Sat Oct 13, 2007 1:16 am
- Location: Garden Grove, CA
#7
Post
by Estonut » Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:31 pm
themanintheseersuckersuit wrote:Estonut wrote:Speaking of Dubai, has anyone else seen the Discovery Channel special "Impossible City"? It is all about the emergence of Dubai as a luxury travel destination. They have made many architectural advancements in order to build what they have built/are building. One statistic that stuck in my mind was that 25% of the construction cranes currently in operation on the planet are in Dubai. Unbelievable.
That report on construction cranes may be a bit exaggerated.
http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/dubais- ... ation-341/
I thought the percentage seemed disproportionately high. That's why it stuck with me. I didn't doubt it because I thought Discovery programs were fairly well-researched.
I did notice, however, that the article refers to a debunking article from 2000. I believe the program was dated 2007. The construction boom may well have exploded there in 7 years.