Senate Committee confirms Russian interference

[Bob78164]

The (Republican-controlled) Senate Intelligence Committee issued a report today confirming that the Russian government interfered with our 2016 election with the goal of electing Donny. Which will be news to absolutely no one who's been paying attention, but perhaps the fact that this comes from a Republican-controlled committee will help penetrate the web of denial trapping at least a few people who get their "news" from Fox. --Bob

[silverscreenselect]

The (Republican-controlled) Senate Intelligence Committee issued a report today confirming that the Russian government interfered with our 2016 election with the goal of electing Donny. Which will be news to absolutely no one who's been paying attention, but perhaps the fact that this comes from a Republican-controlled committee will help penetrate the web of denial trapping at least a few people who get their "news" from Fox. --Bob

It's times like this that I really, really miss Flock's insightful commentary.

[SportsFan68]

The (Republican-controlled) Senate Intelligence Committee issued a report today confirming that the Russian government interfered with our 2016 election with the goal of electing Donny. Which will be news to absolutely no one who's been paying attention, but perhaps the fact that this comes from a Republican-controlled committee will help penetrate the web of denial trapping at least a few people who get their "news" from Fox. --Bob

It's times like this that I really, really miss Flock's insightful commentary.

I would like to see Flock's remarks on this.

[Bob78164]

The (Republican-controlled) Senate Intelligence Committee issued a report today confirming that the Russian government interfered with our 2016 election with the goal of electing Donny. Which will be news to absolutely no one who's been paying attention, but perhaps the fact that this comes from a Republican-controlled committee will help penetrate the web of denial trapping at least a few people who get their "news" from Fox. --Bob

It's times like this that I really, really miss Flock's insightful commentary.

I would like to see Flock's remarks on this.

Honestly, I prefer signal to noise. Some of the other recent departures at least made an effort. --Bob

[SportsFan68]

It's times like this that I really, really miss Flock's insightful commentary.

I would like to see Flock's remarks on this.

Honestly, I prefer signal to noise. Some of the other recent departures at least made an effort. --Bob

Nice, Bob########. You got us both with one swipe.

[Bob78164]

I would like to see Flock's remarks on this.

Honestly, I prefer signal to noise. Some of the other recent departures at least made an effort. --Bob

Nice, Bob########. You got us both with one swipe.

Wasn't aiming at you or sss. You're entitled to your opinion. I simply choose to express and explain mine. --Bob

[SportsFan68]

Honestly, I prefer signal to noise. Some of the other recent departures at least made an effort. --Bob

Nice, Bob########. You got us both with one swipe.

Wasn't aiming at you or sss. You're entitled to your opinion. I simply choose to express and explain mine. --Bob

You were aiming at Flock and me. Good shot.

[Bob78164]

Nice, Bob########. You got us both with one swipe.

Wasn't aiming at you or sss. You're entitled to your opinion. I simply choose to express and explain mine. --Bob

You were aiming at Flock and me. Good shot.

sss has expressed the same opinion as you did here. I wasn't aiming at either of you. --Bob