The only question here is MOTIVE. Did he ask for investigations for 'dirt'. (BTW, for all the dems who said the word 'corruption' was never said, where was the word 'dirt' said?), did he ask for help in the ongoing investigations by Barr and Durham from a source that might have information we don't have? The only evidence that was allowed to be presented was supporting the former.silverscreenselect wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 10:52 amVictims of extortion have a tendency not to admit that, especially when the person doing the extorting remains in a position of power.
And again, it's not just Bob and I and Adam Schiff claiming that Trump has committed impeachable actions. A large number of legal experts have said the same thing (including a number of Republicans and other conservatives). Even if you can find one or two to support your point of view doesn't mean that there wasn't ample evidence presented in the impeachment proceedings and ample grounds for impeaching Trump.
When Rudy Giuliani and Sean Hannity are your legal experts, you've got a problem Flock.
If you would leave out the extraneous bullshit from your posts, you might actually pass for a reasonable, albeit misinformed, person.