WWTBAM Bored

Estonut wrote: In this case, I agree with BiT's statement, so I have no direct, personal knowledge that his statement is untrue.

So, let me get this straight. You disagree with my opinions about broad brush statements, of which neither you nor I have any personal knowledge, so you feel free to call me out and use the word "moron." You agree with BiT's opinion about a broad brush statement, of which neither you nor he has any personal knowledge so you remain silent. Got it.

Do you know the meaning of the word hypocrite?

silverscreenselect wrote:

Estonut wrote: In this case, I agree with BiT's statement, so I have no direct, personal knowledge that his statement is untrue.

So, let me get this straight. You disagree with my opinions about broad brush statements, of which neither you nor I have any personal knowledge, so you feel free to call me out and use the word "moron." You agree with BiT's opinion about a broad brush statement, of which neither you nor he has any personal knowledge so you remain silent. Got it.

Do you know the meaning of the word hypocrite?

Read it again, dumbass! I disagree with your broad-brush statements about Republicans when they do not apply to my views. Thus, I DO have personal knowledge that your such statements are false.

Since I agree with BiT's statement, I have no standing to disagree that it applies to others. Without that information, I do not comment. Get it?

Do you know the meaning of the word "moron?"

silverscreenselect wrote:You agree with BiT's opinion about a broad brush statement, of which neither you nor he has any personal knowledge so you remain silent.

What broad brush statement did I make that Esto agreed with that I have no personal knowledge of?

This one?

Trump (nor the overwhelming majority of his supporters) do not agree with most, if anything, Duke says or stands for.

I have lots of personal knowledge here. I know a lot of people. I know a lot of Trump supporters. I live with them. They are my neighbors. I go to church with them. I work with them, in Texas, in Wisconsin, in Minnesota, in Colorado, in North Dakota, in Florida. I probably could name 3 people I know who might agree with Duke. I can only think of one at the moment, but I'm sure somewhere I know a couple others. Maybe. I do not associate with them, but I do know them. I'm sure you know at least one.

Do a lot of people agree with most of what Duke believes? Depends on what you think a lot of people are. Too many. We can agree on that. But it is not a large percentage of Trump's supporters. Not by a long shot. I say most of what he believes because Duke may like McRibs. If so, then we could say BDM agrees with Duke and he is certainly not a Trump supporter (though he agrees with Duke on that). But on what most identify with Duke, no, most people, including conservatives, Republicans, Trump supporters, liberals, and Democrats disagree with him.

Estonut wrote: Since I agree with BiT's statement, I have no standing to disagree that it applies to others. Without that information, I do not comment. Get it?

I don't recall making statements about what you personally believe or don't believe in. But you are quick to condemn me for expressing my opinion about other people while you give BiT a pass on his opinions about what Trump and other Republicans think because you agree with it, again without personal knowledge.

Better you had stayed out of this thread and have people think you a hypocrite than to dive in and prove it.

I don't recall making statements about what you personally believe or don't believe in.

But I do.
Just an aside. I heard some talking head yesterday say that introspection is a weak point for the left. I have made that point many times. They are catching up to me.
I am not getting back to these pointless political posts. Just want to help my misguided bored buddy.

flockofseagulls104 wrote: I am not getting back to these political posts. Just want to help my bored buddy.

Too bad, Flock. I was looking forward to your spirited defense of Trump's latest statements.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Estonut wrote: Since I agree with BiT's statement, I have no standing to disagree that it applies to others. Without that information, I do not comment. Get it?

I don't recall making statements about what you personally believe or don't believe in. But you are quick to condemn me for expressing my opinion about other people while you give BiT a pass on his opinions about what Trump and other Republicans think because you agree with it, again without personal knowledge.

Better you had stayed out of this thread and have people think you a hypocrite than to dive in and prove it.

1) Read what I said, you fucking idiot!

2) I HAD stayed out of this thread for 3 months until you blindsided me back into it with your comment about/to me. I bet you can't do the same!

3) Just fuck off!

Estonut wrote: 3) Just fuck off!

Well, you're sounding more like Flock all the time. Can't respond to an argument so you cuss me out. I guess that's the sign of a superior right wing intellect.

BackInTex wrote:

Trump (nor the overwhelming majority of his supporters) do not agree with most, if anything, Duke says or stands for.

I have lots of personal knowledge here.

That's the thing. Neither you nor I nor Esto knows what Trump agrees with or doesn't agree with. Trump's statements fall somewhat short on the truthfulness scale. Yet my pointing this out didn't stop Esto from calling me a moron, although he's willing to give you a pass because he agrees with what you say. That's the epitome of hypocrisy. And his level of discourse just deteriorated from that point on.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Estonut wrote: 3) Just fuck off!

Well, you're sounding more like Flock all the time. Can't respond to an argument so you cuss me out. I guess that's the sign of a superior right wing intellect.

I responded to the argument, but you're apparently too dumb to understand. You ignore my first two points, and then call me Flock. Now is that the sign of a superior left-wing intellect?

Estonut wrote:You ignore my first two points, and then call me Flock.

Silly me. I should have responded to the first point in which you called me a fucking idiot rather than the third point when you told me to fuck off.

silverscreenselect wrote:

Estonut wrote:You ignore my first two points, and then call me Flock.

Silly me. I should have responded to the first point in which you called me a fucking idiot rather than the third point when you told me to fuck off.

You should have responded to my first point by re-reading what I said. There's no hypocrisy in my explanation, just logic.

Again, you've ignored my second point. I was done with this thread FOR 3 MONTHS until you blindsided me and dragged me back into it. Do you think you could stay out of it for 3 months?

Estonut wrote: I was done with this thread FOR 3 MONTHS until you blindsided me and dragged me back into it.

Congratulations, Michael Corleone. My "dragging" you back in the thread was intended as a light-hearted jab at BiT for expressing with a degree of certainty that he knows what Trump believes in. You decided to get bent out of shape about this, cussing me out at every opportunity, and revealing your hypocrisy in just about every post you made since then. Apparently, you can dish it out to me, the Bobs, and anyone else you disagree with, but you can't take something that wasn't even directed at you in the first place.

Trump flags and hats made in China are reportedly being held up at customs as trade war heats up

https://www.businessinsider.com/trump-f ... war-2018-7

This one is funny. Trump gave a speech Tuesday in front of a conservative youth group, standing in front of an image that was supposedly the Presidential seal. However, it turned out to be doctored. The "eagle" has two heads, similar to the bird that appears on the Russian flag, and in its left claw, it's holding a number of golf clubs instead of a quiver of arrows. Further, the logo above the bird's head, instead of "E Pluribus Unum" says "45 es un titere," which is Spanish for "45 (Trump is the 45th president) is a puppet":

silverscreenselect wrote:This one is funny. Trump gave a speech Tuesday in front of a conservative youth group, standing in front of an image that was supposedly the Presidential seal. However, it turned out to be doctored. The "eagle" has two heads, similar to the bird that appears on the Russian flag, and in its left claw, it's holding a number of golf clubs instead of a quiver of arrows. Further, the logo above the bird's head, instead of "E Pluribus Unum" says "45 es un titere," which is Spanish for "45 (Trump is the 45th president) is a puppet":

Are you sure, or just Juching it?

BackInTex wrote: Are you sure, or just Juching it?

This has been reported on multiple outlets:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 824386001/

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/ ... g-him.html

https://time.com/5634675/trump-turning- ... ssia-golf/

SSS is just Juching it.

There was a Fox New video of the entire speech, but I'm sure SSS would not deem that credible. So here is the full speech from the WaPo.



at about 52 minutes you see the seal coming into view. You can't see the whole thing and it's not very clear but you can tell the arrows are not golf clubs.

This is what SSS and his ilk do, and unfortunately believe. Some of the terrible symptoms of TDS.

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote: Are you sure, or just Juching it?

This has been reported on multiple outlets:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 824386001/

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/07/ ... g-him.html

https://time.com/5634675/trump-turning- ... ssia-golf/

Watch the video. The ONLY time the seal is presented in the background is around 52 minutes. It is clearly not the fake news picture you posted.

O.K. I see it now. It is to the left, on a separate screen.

It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President. And the left says influence in the elections is terrible. It is. But so is this. I hope whomever did this is caught (and they will be). Unfortunately the left will view them as a hero and setup a GoFund me account and make the rich and famous.

It does show how little the left (and those here) respect our country.

BackInTex wrote:O.K. I see it now. It is to the left, on a separate screen.

It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President. And the left says influence in the elections is terrible. It is. But so is this. I hope whomever did this is caught (and they will be). Unfortunately the left will view them as a hero and setup a GoFund me account and make the rich and famous.

It does show how little the left (and those here) respect our country.

Bless their hearts.

BackInTex wrote:O.K. I see it now. It is to the left, on a separate screen.

It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President. And the left says influence in the elections is terrible. It is. But so is this. I hope whomever did this is caught (and they will be). Unfortunately the left will view them as a hero and setup a GoFund me account and make the rich and famous.

It does show how little the left (and those here) respect our country.

It's just harmless humor that's done all the time. It's not intended to fool anybody, like fake social media posts. And isn't revolting, like what this guy in my area did:

DA: Pa. man faked racist email, impersonated national journalists

BackInTex wrote: It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President.

And that someone is named Donald J. Trump.

BackInTex wrote: It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President. ... It does show how little the left (and those here) respect our country.

We must have a similar prankster on this Bored. Somebody seems to have deleted the post I'm sure you made expressing similar outrage about the Jihad Squad image posted by the Illinois Republicans.

silverscreenselect wrote:

BackInTex wrote: It's obvious someone is working to undermine the respect and success of a sitting U.S. President. ... It does show how little the left (and those here) respect our country.

We must have a similar prankster on this Bored. Somebody seems to have deleted the post I'm sure you made expressing similar outrage about the Jihad Squad image posted by the Illinois Republicans.

I wish someone would play "Entrance of the Gladiators" instead of "Hail to the Chief" when trump walks on stage.