No, bobby. Lawyers did that because that's where the money is.Bob78164 wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2020 1:09 amActually, you're just flat out wrong here. The individuals committing these heinous acts and covering them up do in fact represent the organization. That's why the organization was held financially responsible for their acts and omissions. And it's that financial responsibility, imposed by juries who heard the facts of individual cases, that resulted in the organization's bankruptcy.flockofseagulls104 wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2020 10:34 pmAlso, unfortunately, these individuals were protected by equally evil individuals who thought their higher purpose was to protect the institution, not the children. These individuals do not represent the institutions by any means and should be rooted out and punished to the fullest extent.
So I'll ask again. What do you think society as a whole should have done differently with respect to the organization? --Bob
Oh, and I did answer your last question, you just ignored it. Find and prosecute all the INDIVIDUALS who committed the heinous acts and the INDIVIDUALS who protected those who committed the heinous acts and put effective measures in place to prevent it from happening again. And do not punish the people and entire organization who did nothing wrong. I always go back to an incident in JR High School. Two kids got into a fist fight in the lunch room. Because of those two kids, everyone in the cafeteria at lunch time were required to eat in silence, no talking, for the rest of the school year. We did nothing wrong, but we were punished, because it was easier for those in charge to use their power to control. That seems to be the remedy of first choice by many people who have authotity, and it is wrong, but that's what happens a lot, and is what is happening here.