Another wreck caused by cell phone
- mntetn
- Posts: 1127
- Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 7:20 am
- Location: Nashville, TN
- gsabc
- Posts: 6486
- Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2007 8:03 am
- Location: Federal Bureaucracy City
- Contact:
To me, this is the most important part of the article:
"All seven occupants were thrown from the vehicle. No one was wearing a seat belt, police said."
IMO, auto insurance companies should be allowed to cut your medical coverage from accidents in half if the police accident investigation finds that you weren't wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident. You are at least as responsible for your excess injuries as the person who caused the accident.
"All seven occupants were thrown from the vehicle. No one was wearing a seat belt, police said."
IMO, auto insurance companies should be allowed to cut your medical coverage from accidents in half if the police accident investigation finds that you weren't wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident. You are at least as responsible for your excess injuries as the person who caused the accident.
I just ordered chicken and an egg from Amazon. I'll let you know.
- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
Between 6:40 and 6:50 this morning, Maddie received 3 text messages. She didn't have unlimited texting and I told her not to text when she got her phone, but we get charged if anyone texts her.
She received 30 text messages yesterday.
I switched her to unlimited texting this morning. I switched Emma as well, who sent her sister a message about bankrupting the family with her texting.
Boy have times changed.
She received 30 text messages yesterday.
I switched her to unlimited texting this morning. I switched Emma as well, who sent her sister a message about bankrupting the family with her texting.
Boy have times changed.
- Bob Juch
- Posts: 26427
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 11:58 am
- Location: Oro Valley, Arizona
- Contact:
- HelpBrainTumorPatients
- Merry Man
- Posts: 24
- Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 10:57 pm
- Location: A Google link above the Bored
- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
gsabc wrote:IMO, auto insurance companies should be allowed to cut your medical coverage from accidents in half if the police accident investigation finds that you weren't wearing a seat belt at the time of the accident. You are at least as responsible for your excess injuries as the person who caused the accident.
I totally agree.
I won't drive unless everyone is my car is buckled up.
- ulysses5019
- Purveyor of Avatars
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- PlacentiaSoccerMom
- Posts: 8134
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:47 am
- Location: Placentia, CA
- Contact:
- ulysses5019
- Purveyor of Avatars
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
Ok.....I found some potential avatars to continue this thread...but even I was grossed out.....
But if you'd like to try this at home:
http://www.wikihow.com/Flip-Eyelids-Inside-Out
But if you'd like to try this at home:
http://www.wikihow.com/Flip-Eyelids-Inside-Out
I believe in the usefulness of useless information.
- ulysses5019
- Purveyor of Avatars
- Posts: 19442
- Joined: Mon Oct 08, 2007 10:52 am
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- kayrharris
- Miss Congeniality
- Posts: 11968
- Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 10:48 am
- Location: Auburn, AL
- Contact: